Employee-Centric Corporate Social Responsibility in Philippine Private Higher Education: Engagement, Inclusion, and Internal Social Impact as A Quality Strategy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36733/emas.v7i8.14756Keywords:
employee-centric CSR, employee engagement, inclusion, internal social impact, philippinesAbstract
This study examines employee-centric corporate social responsibility (CSR) as quality infrastructure in Philippine private higher education institutions (HEIs). It addresses a persistent managerial problem: employee well-being initiatives often exist as isolated activities, while workload design, psychosocial risk, inclusion, employee voice, and professional development remain weakly integrated into governance and quality assurance. A qualitative documentary synthesis was conducted using a purposively assembled corpus of 14 sources published from 2020 to 2024, comprising Philippine higher education policies and accreditation guidance, international standards and policy documents, and peer-reviewed studies and reviews. The sources were analyzed through structured coding, cross-source comparison, and contribution-oriented interpretation across five domains: workload fairness, psychosocial safety, inclusion and dignity, employee voice, and capability development. The synthesis identifies three central findings. First, workload transparency and recognition of allied tasks form the operational foundation of credible internal CSR. Second, psychosocial support produces limited value when institutions address symptoms but leave organizational hazards unchanged. Third, employee voice and leadership follow-through connect internal CSR to service continuity by enabling risks to be identified before they affect students. The study proposes that employee-centric CSR creates internal social impact when it is embedded in decision rights, monitoring routines, and quality assurance rather than delivered as stand-alone welfare programs. The findings offer a practical governance framework for private HEI leaders while avoiding causal claims that cannot be supported by documentary evidence.
References
Bacaling-Cabag, Z. Z. (2024). Confronting the wellbeing crisis: Supportive communication as a tool in creating healthier Philippine universities. PCS Review, 16(1). https://ejournals.ph/article.php?id=24928
Coats, S. F., Roemer, E. C., Kent, K. B., Zhang, Y., Davis, M. F., & Goetzel, R. Z. (2024). Scoping review of workplace mental health and well-being programs in higher education institutions. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 66(6), 461–466. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000003086
Commission on Higher Education. (2020). Guidelines on the implementation of flexible learning: Commission on Higher Education Memorandum Order No. 4, Series of 2020. https://ched.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/CMO-No.-4-s.-2020-Guidelines-on-the-Implementation-of-Flexible-Learning.pdf
Commission on Higher Education Regional Office III. (2020, October 16). Memorandum No. 094, Series of 2020: Submission of Learning Continuity Plan (LCP). https://chedro3.ched.gov.ph/chedro3-memorandum-no-094-series-of-2020-submission-of-learning-continuity-plan-lcp/
Fynn, M., & van der Walt, F. (2023). Burnout experienced by academics when teaching online due to the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 21, Article a2062. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v21i0.2062
International Labour Organization. (2022). Mental health at work: Policy brief. https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/%40ed_protect/%40protrav/%40safework/documents/publication/wcms_857226.pdf
International Organization for Standardization. (2021). ISO 45003:2021 occupational health and safety management—Psychological health and safety at work—Guidelines for managing psychosocial risks. https://www.iso.org/standard/64283.html
Naidoo-Chetty, M., & du Plessis, M. (2021). Job demands and job resources of academics in higher education. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 631171. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631171
Philippine Accrediting Association of Schools, Colleges and Universities. (2021). PAASCU accreditation guidebook (2021 ed.). https://www.scribd.com/document/505722901/PAASCU-2021-Accreditation-Guidebook
Plata, S. M. (2024). Policy leadership for faculty members and staff's mental health: A case study of a private university in the Philippines. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 24(2). https://www.dlsu.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/pdf/research/journals/apssr/2024-june-vol24-2/ra4.pdf
Thu, S. H. T., & Quynh, A. L. X. (2024). A vivid study on corporate social responsibility and its internal perception: Bibliometric analysis approach. Acta Psychologica, 251, Article 104611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104611
Vizcarra, M. L. O., Aragon, A. E. A., Tiangco, P.-V. V., & Basarte, C. A. (2024). Faculty workload and well-being at President Ramon Magsaysay State University: Impacts of allied tasks on stress and health. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 5(12). https://ejournals.ph/article.php?id=25098
World Health Organization. (2022). WHO guidelines on mental health at work. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240053052
Wu, A. W., Connors, C., & Everly, G. S. (2021). Organizational best practices supporting mental health in the workplace. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 63(12), e925–e931. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002407
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hazel S. Osano, Anik Yuesti, Joel Arante Alve

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



