A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW: TRENDS SOCIOSCIENTIFIC ISSUES IN CLIMATE CHANGE MATERIALS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36733/jsp.v14i1.8666Keywords:
Review Sistematis, Perubahan Iklim, PRISMA, Nature of Science (NOS), Isu SosialsainsAbstract
Socioscientific issues (SSI) merupakan isu pendidikan kontemporer yang yang menjadi bagi bekal siswa di dalam kehidupan bermasyarakat. Tujuan dari Systematic Literature Review (SLR) ini adalah untuk menganalisis a) Teori SSI yang paling relevan dipergunakan pada materi perubahan iklim , b) Metodologi yang paling relevan dipergunakan pada SSI dengan materi perubahan Iklim. Dan c) Kesimpulan serta sugesti untuk arah penelitian SSI berbasis materi perubahan iklim. Penelitian SLR ini menggunakan protokol PRISMA (Preffered Reporting Item for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) dengan search engine website Wiley, DOAJ, dan Springer. Dari 419 data based artikel hasil penelusuran dalam interval waktu 2017-2021 diperoleh 8 artikel yang sesuai dengan kriteria pencarian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa teori SSI yang paling banyak dipergunakan di dalam penelitian yang terkait dengan materi perubahan iklim adalah teori (Herman et al., 2018), Sedangkan metodologi yang paling relevan dipergunakan dalam penelitian adalah metode kuantitative, mixed methods, dan kualitatif. Hasil sintesis dari kesimpulan dan saran Systematic Review mengarah kepada SSI dalam sebagai place-based instruction mampu mengembangkan berbagai jenis kompetensi siswa diluar kompetensi pedagogisnya, sehingga rekomendasi penelitian selanjutnya lebih berfokus pada pengembangan profesionalisme guru, kemampuan metakognitif siswa, dan merancang pembelajaran agar menerapkan pemahaman siswa tentang SSI serta Nature of Science (NOS).
Downloads
References
Bossér, U., & Lindahl, M. (2019). Students Positioning in the Classroom: a Study of Teacher-Student Interactions in a Socioscientific Issue Context. Research in Science Education, 49(2), 371–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9627-1
Büssing, A. G., Dupont, J., & Menzel, S. (2020). Topic Specificity and Antecedents for Preservice Biology Teachers’ Anticipated Enjoyment for Teaching About Socioscientific Issues: Investigating Universal Values and Psychological Distance. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(July). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01536
Dawson, V., & Carson, K. (2020). Introducing Argumentation About Climate Change Socioscientific Issues in a Disadvantaged School. Research in Science Education, 50(3), 863–883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9715-x
Eggert, S., Nitsch, A., Boone, W. J., Nückles, M., & Bögeholz, S. (2017). Supporting Students’ Learning and Socioscientific Reasoning About Climate Change—the Effect of Computer-Based Concept Mapping Scaffolds. Research in Science Education, 47(1), 137–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9493-7
Herman, B. C., Owens, D. C., Oertli, R. T., Zangori, L. A., & Newton, M. H. (2019). Exploring the Complexity of Students’ Scientific Explanations and Associated Nature of Science Views Within a Place-Based Socioscientific Issue Context. Science and Education, 28(3–5), 329–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00034-4
Herman, B. C., Sadler, T. D., Zeidler, D. L., & Newton, M. H. (2018). A Socioscientific Issues Approach to Environmental Education. 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67732-3_11
Herman, B. C., Zeidler, D. L., & Newton, M. (2020). Students’ Emotive Reasoning Through Place-Based Environmental Socioscientific Issues. Research in Science Education, 50(5), 2081–2109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9764-1
Hou, H. T., & Wang, S. M. (2016). Analyzing Students’ Cognitive Processing Patterns of a Socioscientific Issue Learning Activity with Online Discussion - A Preliminary Result of Lag Sequential Analysis. Proceedings - 2015 IIAI 4th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics, IIAI-AAI 2015, 335–338. https://doi.org/10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2015.216
Leung, J. S. C. (2020). A Practice-Based Approach to Learning Nature of Science through Socioscientific Issues. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09942-w
Liu, S., & Roehrig, G. (2019). Exploring Science Teachers’ Argumentation and Personal Epistemology About Global Climate Change. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9617-3
Methley, A. M., Campbell, S., Chew-Graham, C., McNally, R., & Cheraghi-Sohi, S. (2014). PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: A comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Services Research, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0579-0
Presley, M. L., Sickel, A. J., Muslu, N., & Merle-, D. (2013). A framework for socio-scientific issues based education. Science Educator, 22, 26–32. http://kaputcenter.org/2018/08/a-framework-for-socio-scientific-issues-based-education/
Reid, A. (2019). Climate change education and research: possibilities and potentials versus problems and perils? Environmental Education Research, 25(6), 767–790. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1664075
Zawacki-Richter, O., Kerres, M., Bedenlier, S., & Bond, M. (2020). Systematic Reviews in Educational Research. In Systematic Reviews in Educational Research (Issue November). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27602-7
Zeidler, D. L., Herman, B. C., & Sadler, T. D. (2019). New directions in socioscientific issues research. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0008-7
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ida Bagus Ari Arjaya, Sang Putu Kaler Surata
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
