PENERAPAN MODEL TRI PRAMANA SPA DITINJAU DARI MOTIVASI SISWA TERHADAP KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA

  • Ida Bagus Ari Arjaya Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi FKIP Unmas Denpasar
  • Kadek Rahayu Puspadewi Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi FKIP Unmas Denpasar
Keywords: Critical Thinking, Model Tri Pramana SPA, Learning Motivation

Abstract

The purposes of this research are to analyze: 1) The difference of critical thinking ability between Model Tri Pramana SPA (MTPSPA) and Model Pembelajaran Konvensional (MPK), 2) the differences in critical thinking skills between MTPSPA and MPK in students with high learning motivation, 3) The differences in critical thinking skills between MTPSPA and MTPSPA in students with low learning motivation, 4) The interactive effect between learning model and learning motivation toward students' critical thinking ability.

The population of this study was all students of SMP Negeri 7 Denpasar academic year 2016/2017. The Samping technique that was used was group random sampling method with a quasi experiment design. The prerequisite data analysis consisted of internal validity analysis and interrater reliability. Two Way Analyze of Variant (ANAVA) by using SPSS 17 for Windows Software was used as the data analysis technique. The result of the present study are 1) there was significant difference of students’ critical thinking between MTPSPA and MPK (p=0,000 < α = 0,05), 2) there was significant difference of students’ critical thinking between MTPSPA and MPK for high motivation (p=0,000 < α = 0,05), 3) there was significant difference of students’ critical thinking between MTPSPA and MPK for low motivation (p=0,000 < α = 0,05), 4) there is no interaction effect between learning model and students learning motivation toward students' critical thinking (p = 0,482> α = 0,05).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arnyana.(2004). Pengembangan Perangkat Model Belajar Berdasarkan Masalah Dipandu Strategi Kooperatif Serta Pengaruh Implementasinya Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas Pada Pelajaran Ekosistem.Disertasi(tidak diterbitkan).Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.
Bandura, A. (2001). “Social cognitive theory: An agentive perspective”. Annual Review of Psychology, Volume 52, Nomor 1 (hlm. 1–26).
Darma, K. (2007). Pengaruh model pembelajaran konstruktivisme terhadap prestasi belajar matematika terapan pada mahasiswa Politeknik Negeri Bali. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor.70.
Ennis, R.H.(1985). A Logical Basis for Measuring Critical Thinking Skills. Educational Leadership. Nomor 43,Volume 2.
Glynn, S. M., G. Taasoobshirazi, P. Brickman. (2009). Nonscience majors learning science: A theoretical model of motivation.Journal of Research In Science Teaching, Volume 46, Nomor 2 (hlm. 127–146).
Glynn, S.M., & Koballa, T.R.,Jr.(2006). Motivation to learn college science. In Joel J. Mintzes and William H. Leonard (Eds.). Handbook of College Science Teaching (pp.25-32).Arlington,VA: National Science Teacher Assosiation Press.
Johnson, E. B.(2002).Contextual Teaching and Learning.California: Corwin Press, Inc.
Liliasari.(2000). Model Pembelajaran untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Konseptual Tingkat Tinggi Calon Guru IPA. Prosiding Seminar Nasional.Dirjen Dikti Depdiknas-JICA-IMSTEP.Malang: 23 Februari.
OECD.(2013).PISA 2012 results: whats student know and can do-student performance in mathematics, reading and science (volume i).[Online]. Tersedia pada :http://www.oecd.org. (diakses pada tanggal 01 Juli 2015).
Sadewo, J.(2015). Kemana Arah Pendidikan Indonesia?.[Online]. Tersedia pada: http://www.republika.co.id/berita/pendidikan/eduaction/14/02/27/n1nns0-kemana- arah pendidikan-indonesia (diakses pada tanggal 01 April 2016).
Santyasa, I W. (2004). Pengaruh model dan seting pembelajaran terhadap remediasi miskonsepsi, pemahaman konsep, dan hasil belajar siswa pada siswa SMU. Disertasi (tidak diterbitkan). Universitas Negeri Malang.
Santrock, J. W. (2008). Psikologi pendidikan, Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Kencana.
Shadiq, F. (2004). Implikasi konstruktivismedalam pembelajaran matematika sekolah dasar. Tersedia pada http://fadjarp3g.files.wordpress.com/2007/09 /med2konstruksdok_median_.pdf. Diakses tanggal 5 April 2017.
Sigler, E. A. & Saam, J. (2007).Constructivist or expository instructional approach: Does instruction have an effect on the accuracy of Judgement of Learning (JOL). Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Volume 7 Nomor 2(hlm. 22-31).
Suastra, I Wayan. (2006). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Singaraja : IKIP Negeri Singajara.
Subagia, I.W. & Lanang W. I.G.(2005). Pengembangan Model Siklus Belajar Berdasarkan Potensi-Potensi Kearifan Lokal Masyarakat Bali Dalam Bidang Pendidikan. Laporan Penelitian Hibah Bersaing. Singaraja : IKIP Singaraja.
Subagia, I W. dan Wiratma, I G. L. 2007. Model Siklus Belajar Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Masyarakat Bali. Singaraja: Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.
Suma, K. (2005). Efektivitas kegiatan laboratorium konstruktivis dalam meningkatkan penguasaan konsep-konsep arus searah mahasiswa calon guru. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran IKIP Negeri Singaraja. 38(2), 159 - 171.
Utama, A. A. P. A. A. S., Agung, Riastin.(2013).Pengaruh Siklus Belajar Berbasis Tri Pramana Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis IPA Siswa Kelas V SD Di Gugus V Kecamatan Sawan. Jurnal Portal Garuda. Diunduh dari
Published
2017-08-31