KONSEP COURTROOM TELEVISION DALAM PERADILAN PIDANA SEBAGAI IMPLEMENTASI ASAS TERBUKA UNTUK UMUM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36733/jhshs.v7i01.11497Keywords:
Courtroom Television, Criminal Justice, The Principle Of Openness To The PublicAbstract
The concept of courtroom television has been implemented in Indonesia but not in its entirety. The implementation of courtroom television in criminal justice still has pros and cons which of course can provide education to the public about the law and carry out judicial supervision. This study uses a normative legal research method. The validity of courtroom television from the legal aspect of the principle of being open to the public, the openness of this trial is basically the State of Indonesia as a country of law requires the enforcement of nomocracy that can truly be implemented objectively. The concept of courtroom television or courtroom television is a complete and live broadcast covered by the press in the courtroom with a set of electronic media equipment by means of broadcasting, to divert and focus attention on all subjects (Judges, Clerks, Public Prosecutors, Lawyers, Defendants and Witnesses or Experts) without any review or comment. Open trials to the public, born from the principle of due process of law which is inseparable from the history of Human Rights.
References
Buku
Lambert, Paul, 2013, Television Courtroom Broadcasting Effects: The Empirical Research and the Supreme Court Challenge, University Press of America, Chicago.
Jurnal
Dharmawan, Ni Ketut Supasti, 2015, Keberadaan Pemegang Saham Dalam Rups Dengan Sistem Teleconference Terkait Jaringan Bermasalah Dalam Perspektif Cyber Law, Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), Vol. 4, No. 1, April, h. 15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2015.v04.i01.p15
Susrama, I Nengah dan Sukma, Putu Angga Pratama, 2019, Pelaksanaan Courtroom Television Dalam Peradilan Pidana Dengan Agenda Saksi, Jurnal Hukum Sasana, Vol. 5, No. 1, Juni, h. 61-74 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31599/sasana.v5i1.92
Sutrisni, Ni Komang., Sukma, Putu Angga Pratama Sukma., Embong, Rahimah., Haydarov, Kanlar., 2024, The Compliance of Governance on Family Data Protection Regulation, Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, Vol. 4, No. 3, Desember, h. 706-741 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v4i3.293
Wedha, Yogi Yasa, 2020, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebagai Salah Satu Wujud Pelaksanaan Keadilan Restoratif (Restorative Justice), Vol. 1, No. 2, September, h. 411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38043/jah.v1i2.411
Wijaya, Made Hendra., Permadhi, Putu Lantika Oka, 2021, Prinsip-Prinsip Tri Hita Karana Di Dalam Pengaturan Hukum Kepariwisataan Di Bali (Berdasarkan Pada Peraturan Daerah (Perda) Provinsi Bali Nomor 5 Tahun 2020 Tentang Standar Penyelenggaraan Kepariwisataan Budaya Bali), Jurnal Hukum Saraswati (JHS), Vol. 3, No. 1, Maret, h27-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36733/jhshs.v3i1.1845
Makarim, Edmon, 2012, The Protection Of Consumers’ Rights And The Application Of Criminal Law In The Unlawful Operation Of Services And Content Service Applications, Indonesia Law Review, Vol. 2, No. 2, September, h. 226. DOI: https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/ilrev/vol2/iss2/6
Shekhar, Beulah., R. Ranjani., 2023, Access to Justice for Victims of Crime in India: An Analysis of Section 372 CrPC, Journal of Victimology and Victim Justice, Vol. 6, No. 1, Juli, h. 64-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/25166069231160434
Siregar, Rahmat Efendy Al Amin, 2016, Due Process Of Law Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia Kaitannya Dengan Perlindungan HAM, FITRAH: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, Vol. 1 No. 1, Juni, h. 35-45. DOI: 10.24952/fitrah.v1i1.326
Internet
https://news.detik.com/berita/d-7603935/3-hakim-tersangka-suap-vonis-bebas-ronald-tannur-terancam-seumur-hidup-bui diakses pada tanggal 16 Pebruari 2025
https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6852816/jaksa-fahrur-rozi-terima-suap-13-tahun-lamanya-kini-dijerat-jadi-tersangka diakses pada tanggal 16 Pebruari 2025
https://news.detik.com/berita/d-7772098/eks-panitera-pn-jaktim-dituntut-4-tahun-bui-di-kasus-suap-eksekusi-lahan. diakses pada tanggal 16 Pebruari 2025
https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2023/05/25/09332601/divonis-8-tahun-pengacara-yang-menyuap-hakim-agung-tak-ajukan-banding. diakses pada tanggal 16 Pebruari 2025
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Undang Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.
Undang Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 40 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pers.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
- Copyright notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
