Effect of Solvent and Extraction Method on Secondary Metabolites and IC50 of Beetroot extract (Beta vulgaris)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36733/usadha.v2i1.5277Keywords:
beetroot, Beta vulgaris L, extraction, maceration, phytochemical, solvent, ultrsonicAbstract
Beetroot (Beta vulgaris L.) contains phenolic, flavonoid, and tannin, as well as anthocyanin and betacyanin pigments which are strong antioxidant compounds. The extraction process is needed to collect the phytochemical content in plant samples. Several factors affect the extract's phytochemical content, including the extraction method and solvent. This research was conducted to determine the effect of maceration and ultrasonic extraction methods and solvents on the levels of phenol, flavonoids, tannins, anthocyanins, and the IC50 value of beetroot extract. This research is experimental laboratory research. Extraction of beetroot was carried out by maceration (M) and ultrasonic (U) using water solvents (MA & UA), 50% ethanol (ME50 & UE50), and 96% ethanol (ME96 & UE96). Phytochemical quantification was carried out on phenols, flavonoids, tannins, and anthocyanins levels. The antioxidant activity test was carried out using the DPPH method to obtain the IC50 value. Data analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a 95% confidence level. The results showed that the selection of extraction methods and solvents affected the concentration of phenols, flavonoids, tannins, and anthocyanins, as well as the antioxidant activity of the extracts. The UE96 extract produced the highest concentrations of phenols, flavonoids, tannins, and anthocyanins compared to other extracts, with the lowest IC50. All results showed significant differences (p<0.05) except for the anthocyanin content produced by ME96 and UA extracts. In conclusion, the ultrasonic method with 96% ethanol solvent is considered the best method for extracting beetroot (Beta vulgaris L.), producing extract with good antioxidant activity and high levels of phenol, flavonoids, tannins, and anthocyanins.
References
Dirja BT, Kusuma DR. Prospek Media Sel Punca Jaringan Terkondisi Sebagai Anti-Aging. J Kedokt 2021; 10: 464–467.
Setiawan MAW, Nugroho EK, Lestario LN. Extraction of Betacyanin from Beet (Beta vulgaris) Peel for Natural Dyes. Agric J Ilmu
Pertan 2015; 27: 38–43.
Husna N El, Novita M, Rohaya S. Anthocyanins Content and Antioxidant Activity of Fresh Purple Fleshed Sweet Potato and Selected
Products. Chemistry (Easton). Epub ahead of print 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/AGRITECH.9551.
Turkmen N, Sari F, Velioglu YS. Effects of extraction solvents on concentration and antioxidant activity of black and black mate tea
polyphenols determined by ferrous tartrate and Folin-Ciocalteu methods. Food Chem 2006; 99: 835–841.
Sasadara MMV, Wirawan IGP. Effect of extraction solvent on total phenolic content, total flavonoid content, and antioxidant activity
of Bulung Sangu (Gracilaria sp.) Seaweed. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci; 712. Epub ahead of print 2021. DOI: 10.1088/1755 1315/712/1/012005.
Do QD, Angkawijaya AE, Tran-Nguyen PL, et al. Effect of extraction solvent on total phenol content, total flavonoid content, and
antioxidant activity of Limnophila aromatica. J Food Drug Anal 2014; 22: 296–302.
Hilbig J, Alves VR, Müller CMO, et al. Ultrasonic-assisted extraction combined with sample preparation and analysis using LC-ESI-
MS/MS allowed the identification of 24 new phenolic compounds in pecan nut shell [Carya illinoinensis (Wangenh) C. Koch] extracts.
Food Res Int 2018; 106: 549–557.
Kumar K, Srivastav S, Sharanagat VS. Ultrasound assisted extraction (UAE) of bioactive compounds from fruit and vegetable
processing by-products: A review. Ultrason Sonochem 2021; 70: 105325.
Huang W, Xue A, Niu H, et al. Optimised ultrasonic-assisted extraction of flavonoids from Folium eucommiae and evaluation of
antioxidant activity in multi-test systems in vitro. Food Chem 2009; 114: 1147–1154.
Feng S, Luo Z, Tao B, et al. Ultrasonic-assisted extraction and purification of phenolic compounds from sugarcane (Saccharum
officinarum L.) rinds. Lwt 2015; 60: 970–976.
Wen C, Zhang J, Zhang H, et al. Advances in ultrasound assisted extraction of bioactive compounds from cash crops – A review.
Ultrason Sonochem 2018; 48: 538–549.
Sayuti M. Pengaruh Perbedaan Metode Ekstraksi, Bagian Dan Jenis Pelarut Terhadap Rendemen Dan Aktifitas Antioksidan Bambu
Laut (Isis Hippuris). Technol Sci Eng J 2017; 1: 2549–1601.
Afrilia Y. Kajian Optimasi Ekstraksi Flavonoid Dengan Bantuan Gelombang Mikro Pada Kulit Alpukat (Persea Americana Mill.)
Menggunakan Response Surface Methodology. Universitas Sumatera Utara, http://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/39602
(2021).
McDonald S, Prenzler PD, Antolovich M, et al. Phenolic content and antioxidant activity of olive extracts. Food Chem 2001; 73: 73–
Chang CC, Yang MH, Wen HM, et al. Estimation of total flavonoid content in propolis by two complementary colometric methods. J
Food Drug Anal 2002; 10: 178–182.
Shim SM, Yi HL, Kim YS. Bioaccessibility of flavonoids and total phenolic content in onions and its relationship with antioxidant
activity. Int J Food Sci Nutr 2011; 62: 835–838.
Li Y, Kong D, Fu Y, et al. The effect of developmental and environmental factors on secondary metabolites in medicinal plants.
Plant Physiol Biochem 2020; 148: 80–89.
Stalikas CD. Extraction, separation, and detection methods for phenolic acids and flavonoids. J Sep Sci 2007; 30: 3268–3295.
Handayani H, Sriherfyna FH, Yunianta. Ekstraksi Antioksidan Daun Sirsak Metode Ultrasonic Bath. J Pangan dan Agroindustri 2016;
: 262–272.
Adhiksana A. Perbandingan metode konvensional ekstraksi pektin dari kulit buah pisang dengan metode ultrasonik. J Res Technol
; 3: 80–88.
Monteiro M, Santos RA, Iglesias P, et al. Effect of extraction method and solvent system on the phenolic content and antioxidant
activity of selected macro- and microalgae extracts. J Appl Phycol 2020; 32: 349–362.
Candra Riskiana et al. Kajian Pengaruh Pelarut Terhadap Aktivitas Antioksidan Alga Coklat Genus Sargassum dengan Metode
Dpph. J Holistics Heal Sci 2021; 3: 201–213