Potensi Penerapan Green Accounting Masa Depan melalui Perspektif Paradigma Positivisme

Authors

  • Muhammad Syarifuddin Universitas Trisakti
  • Khomsiyah Universitas Trisakti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36733/jia.v2i1.8565

Keywords:

Paradigma Positivisme, Green Accounting, Akuntansi Berkelanjutan

Abstract

Green accounting has become a major concern in contemporary accounting literature to integrate information related to environmental and social externalities into organizational reporting systems. This article aims to analyze the potential and challenges of implementing green accounting in the future through the lens of the positivism paradigm. Through a literature review, this paper discusses the concept of the Khun paradigm and Auguste Comte's positivism to provide a philosophical basis for the development of green accounting. In addition, based on the empirical study of the article, findings related to the current implementation of green accounting, the challenges and obstacles faced, as well as potential strategies to ensure successful implementation in the future are also discussed. The results of the literature review show the need for consistent standardization by regulators to encourage widespread adoption of green accounting. Apart from that, the use of digital technology and collaboration between various stakeholders is the key to the successful implementation of green accounting in the future in achieving sustainable development goals.

References

Andrew, J., & Cortese, C. (2013). Free market environmentalism and the neoliberal project: The case of the Climate Disclosure Standards Board. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(6), 397-409.

Creswell, J. D., Al-Harbi, M. S., Tajuddin, S. T., Chy, N. A.,Watkins, E. R., & Williamson, R. (2023). Rethinking the role of positivist and relativist paradigms in psychology research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(3), 599-617.

Deegan, C. (2017). Twenty five years of social and environmental accounting research within Critical Perspectives of Accounting: Hits, misses and ways forward. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 43, 65-87.

Fernando, Y., Antony, J., Wiek, A. et al. (2023). Mapping the intellectual structure of green accounting for sustainability research. Business Strategy and The Environment, 32(4), 525-545.

Junior, R. R., Herbohn, K., & Russell, S. (2022). Implementing the Triple Bottom Line Approach: A Systematic Literature Review. In Conversations About Responsible Economies in Historical Perspectives (pp. 291-319). Emerald Publishing Limited.

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago press.

Kılıç, M., & Kuzey, C. (2023). Current state of corporate sustainability reporting research: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 124000.

Matuszak, Ł., & Różańska, E. (2023). Towards Strong Sustainability Reporting Standards in the European Union–the CSRD Proposal Overview. European Research Studies Journal, 26(1), 462-479.

OJK (2022). Roadmap Keuangan Berkelanjutan Tahun 2022-2025. No. S-30/D.04/2022. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan.

World Bank (2022). Carbon Pricing Dashboard. Diakses dari https://carbonpricingdashboard.worldbank.org/

Downloads

Published

2024-12-12

How to Cite

Syarifuddin, M., & Khomsiyah. (2024). Potensi Penerapan Green Accounting Masa Depan melalui Perspektif Paradigma Positivisme. Jurnal Inovasi Akuntansi (JIA), 2(2), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.36733/jia.v2i1.8565

Issue

Section

Articles