The Role of Auditor Independence in Audit Quality and Fraud Mitigation: A Systematic Literature Review

Authors

  • Kekoto Manneh Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Indonesia
  • Indrawati Yuhertiana Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Indonesia
  • Rida Perwita Sari Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36733/jia.v4i1.13427

Keywords:

auditor independence, audit quality, financial fraud, technological tools, governance

Abstract

Purpose: This study seeks to investigate the contribution of auditors’ independence to the quality of audit services and the mitigation of financial fraud. It also analyses the contextual, technological, and behavioural factors that influence auditor independence. By integrating perspectives from both developed and emerging economies, the study highlights overlooked issues of independence in digital auditing and gender governance, while suggesting directions for future research and policy development. Method: This study employed a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) guided by the PRISMA framework. The review consisted of 72 peer-reviewed journal articles obtained primarily from the Scopus-indexed database. The selected articles were analysed to identify key themes related to auditor independence, audit quality, fraud prevention, digital tools, and regulatory environments. Findings: The findings identify four main themes: (1) the impact of auditor independence on the credibility of audit reports, (2) the role of independence in fraud detection and prevention, (3) the influence of digital tools on independent audit judgment, and (4) differences in independence practices across regulatory environments. The study concludes that auditor independence enhances professional skepticism and strengthens audit reliability. Implications: This SLR provides implications for audit firms, regulators, and academics. Audit firms need to strengthen safeguards for auditor independence, enhance ethical training, manage non-audit service risks, and reinforce functional independence through stronger governance mechanisms. Regulators should improve oversight and policy frameworks to ensure independence is maintained in both traditional and digital audit environments. For academia, the study identifies research gaps and provides opportunities for future empirical and comparative studies on auditor independence.

References

Al-Qadasi, A. A., Baatwah, S. R., Ghaleb, B. A., & Qasem, A. (2023). Do Industry Specialist Audit Firms Influence Real Earnings Management? The Role of Auditor Independence. Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review, 26(2), 356–370. https://doi.org/10.6018/RCSAR.480421

Alaamri, Y., Hussainey, K., Nandy, M., & Lodh, S. (2024). The impact of audit quality and climate change reporting on corporate performance: a review and future research agenda. Journal of Accounting Literature, 46(4), 611–629. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAL-05-2023-0081

Alotaibi, E. M., & Alnesafi, A. (2023). Assessing the impact of audit software on audit quality: Auditors’ perceptions. International Journal of Applied Economics, Finance and Accounting, 17(1), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.33094/ijaefa.v17i1.1068

Alwadani, N., & Aljaaidi, K. (2024). The impact of corruption on auditor independence: The case of gifts and discounts. International Journal of Public Policy and Administration Research, 11(2), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.18488/74.v11i2.3711

Alyousef, L., & Alsughayer, S. (2021). The relationship between corporate governance and voluntary disclosure: The role of boards of directors and audit committees. Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance, 9(4), 678–692. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujaf.2021.090414

An, Y. (2023). Does Quality of Audit Committee Enhance Audit Quality? International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i2.1385

Arthur, K. K., Asongu, S. A., Darko, P., Ansah, M. O., Adom, S., & Hlortu, O. (2025). Financial crimes in Africa and economic growth: Implications for achieving sustainable development goals (SDGs). Journal of Economic Surveys, 39(3), 1212–1251. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12652

Ashraf, M., Michas, P. N., & Russomanno, D. (2020). The Impact of Audit Committee Information Technology Expertise on the Reliability and Timeliness of Financial Reporting. The Accounting Review, 95(5), 23–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52622

Benavides-Sánchez, E. P., Moya-Clemente, I., & Ribes-Giner, G. (2025). Bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review of the relationship between sustainable development goals and sustainable entrepreneurship over time. Discover Sustainability, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00572-0

Chen, C., Liu, Z., Tang, W., & Tuo, L. (2024). Accounting reporting complexity, audit engagement partner mandatory rotation, and audit quality. Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance, 35(2), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22679

Cilliers, S. (2023). Emotional intelligence as a key driver of the formation of professional scepticism in auditors. South African Journal of Business Management, 54(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v54i1.3654

Dewi, Y. R. K., Tubastuvi, N., Purwidianti, W., & Widyaningtyas, D. (2025). Exploring The Impact Of Social, Corporate Governance and Environmental On Return On Assets. Jurnal Akuntansi Trisakti, 12(1), 1–20.

Dikuua, M. B., Maroun, W., van Zijl, W., & Ram, A. J. (2023). Audit regulation and its relevance for audit quality in Namibia. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 26(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v26i1.4866

El-Dyasty, M. M., & Elamer, A. A. (2021). The effect of auditor type on audit quality in emerging markets: evidence from Egypt. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 29(1), 43–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-04-2020-0060

El Badlaoui, A., Naji, S., & Chegri, B. (2024). Audit expectation gap: Evidence from Morocco. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 21(2), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.21(2).2024.13

Harber, M., Verhoef, G., & Villiers, C. De. (2022). Disputed interpretations and active strategies of resistance during an audit regulatory debate. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journa. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-12-2020-5049

Hrazdil, K., Simunic, D. A., & Suwanyangyuan, N. (2024). Auditor Choice and the Informativeness of 10-K Reports. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 39(2), 388–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X211062430

Ismail, R., Mohd-Saleh, N., & Yakob, R. (2022). Audit Committee Effectiveness, Internal Audit Function and Financial Reporting Lag: Evidence From Malaysia. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 18(2), 169–193. https://doi.org/10.21315/aamjaf2022.18.2.8

Jacinta O. (2023). Audit Independence and Financial Reporting Quality: A Study of Listed Non-Financial Firms in Nigeria. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews Journal Homepage: Www.Ijrpr.Com, 4(7), 455–463. www.ijrpr.com

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

John, K., & Liu, M. (2021). Does the Disclosure of an Audit Engagement Partner’s Name Improve the Audit Quality? A Difference-in-Difference Analysis. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14110508

Kharuddin, K. A. M., Basioudis, I. G., & Farooque, O. Al. (2021). Effects of the Big 4 national and city-level industry expertise on audit quality in the United Kingdom. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 43, 0–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2021.100398

Kim, S. (2021). Does engagement partners’ effort affect audit quality? With a focus on the effects of internal control system. Risks, 9(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9120225

Kim, Y., Lim, J., & Qin, J. (2022). Board networks and audit quality. Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance, 33(3), 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22554

Kurniawan, E. (2023). The Influence of Auditor Independence on Audit Quality: A Qualitative Research. Golden Ratio of Auditing Research, 3(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.52970/grar.v3i1.376

Lamboglia, R., & Mancini, D. (2021). The relationship between auditors’ human capital attributes and the assessment of the control environment. Journal of Management and Governance, 25(4), 1211–1239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-020-09536-8

Lee, D. I. Y., & Phua, L. K. (2022). Does Audit Committee Moderate the Relationship Between Auditor Independence and Earnings Management During Initial Implementation of Mfrs in Malaysia? International Journal of Business and Society, 23(2), 751–772. https://doi.org/10.33736/IJBS.4836.2022

Lisic, L. L. E. I., Myers, L. A., Seidel, T. A., & Zhou, J. (2021). Does Audit Committee Accounting Expertise Help to Promote Audit Quality ? Evidence from Auditor Reporting of Internal Les compétences en comptabilité du comité d ’ audit contribuent-elles à promouvoir la qualité de l ’ audit ? Données tirées des rapports. Contemporary Accounting Research Despite, 36(4), 2521–2553. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12517

Nacer, M., Hafsa, L., El, O., Benlakouiri, G., & Ibtissam, A. (2024). Proposal for a Conceptual Model on the Role of Digitalization in Improving External Audit Quality. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences, 22(2), 3650–3658. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.2.00267

Nouraldeen, R. . (2025). Competent and Independent Auditors but Cannot Detect Fraud!! Do They Exercise Professional Skepticism? International Journal of Disclosure and Governance. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-025-00296-1

Parluhutan, C. A., Ermawati, & Widyastuti, S. (2022). The Influence of Auditor Ethics, Auditor Motivation, Locus of Control on Audit Quality: Role of Professional Skepticism. Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance, 10(1), 267–275. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujaf.2022.100127

Rashid, L. (2019). Entrepreneurship education and sustainable development goals: A literature review and a closer look at fragile states and technology-enabled approaches. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195343

Salehi, M., Ibrahim Jebur, M., Orfizadeh, S., & Abbas Aljahnabi, A. M. (2022). The Relationship between Audit Adjustments and Audit Quality in Iraq. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15080330

Sawan, N., Al-hajaya, K., Altarawneh, M., & Al-makhadmeh, A. (2022). Big Data Analytics in Auditing and the Consequences for Audit Quality : A Study Using the Technology Acceptance Model (Tam). Corporate Governance and Organizational Behavior Review, 6(1), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgobrv6i1p5

Subedi, M. (2023). Independent Audit Matters: Mitigation ff Auditors’ Independence Issues and Biases. EDPACS, 67(2), 15–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07366981.2022.2125538

Valentinov, V., & Chia, R. (2022). Stakeholder theory: A process-ontological perspective. Business Ethics, Environment and Responsibility, 31(3), 762–776. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12441

Viet Ha, H. T., Hung, D. N., & Xuan, N. T. (2023). Corporate governance and the presence of female in the board of directors on audit quality in Vietnam. Quality - Access to Success, 24(193), 314–321. https://doi.org/10.47750/QAS/24.193.35

Wai-Khuen, W., Boon-Heng, T., & Siow-Hooi, T. (2023). The Influence of External Stakeholders on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Reporting: Toward a Conceptual Framework for ESG Disclosure. Foresight and STI Governance, 17(2), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2023.2.9.20

Yami, N., & Poletti-Hughes, J. (2022). Financial Fraud, Independent Female Directors and CEO Power. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15120575

Downloads

Published

2026-06-01

How to Cite

Manneh, K., Yuhertiana, I., & Sari, R. P. (2026). The Role of Auditor Independence in Audit Quality and Fraud Mitigation: A Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Inovasi Akuntansi (JIA), 4(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.36733/jia.v4i1.13427

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check