Biological Mechanism of Orthodontic Movement in The Treatment of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion Using Twin Block

English

Authors

  • Hilda Fitria Lubis Doctoral Program, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia , Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Erik Idrus Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Dewi Fatma Suniarti Sastradipura Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Retno Widayati Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Miesje Karmiati Purwanegara Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46862/interdental.v20i3.9656

Keywords:

Functional appliance, growing age, skeletal class II malocclusion, twin block

Abstract

Introduction: Patients of growing age with dentoskeletal class II malocclusion are often found in the clinic, to avoid further severity it is recommended to use functional appliance in cases involving skeletal.

Review: Functional appliances have been widely used since activators were introduced by Andersen, but the use of activators has many disadvantages such as the shape that blends between the maxilla and mandible making it difficult for patients to open their mouths, speak and eat, then the large shape makes patients uncomfortable and causes facial changes. Clark developed the twin block to answer the previous shortcomings, which is a simple and separate design between the mandible and maxilla causing patients to be more comfortable in speaking and eating so that it is comfortable to use for a long time. Twin block is a functional appliance used to reposition the mandible forward in cases of class II malocclusion with retrognathic mandible.

Conclusion: This paper describes the design and use of twin block and its effectiveness in skeletal correction. In addition, its use was found to improve facial shape, reduce overjet and overbite, corrected molar relationships and alleviated patient complaints.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bahreman A. Early-age orthodontic treatment. 1st edition New York: Quintessence Publishing; 2013. p. 533-543, 549.

Karad A. Clinical orthodontics: current concepts, goals and mechanics. 2nd edition India: Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd; 2015. p. 68-80.

Nanda R. Esthetics and biomechanics in orthodontics. 2nd edition . India: Elsevier Inc.; 2015. p. 197-203.

Bennett JC. Orthodontic management of uncrowded class II division one malocclusion in children. 1st edition . New York: Elsevier Ltd; 2006. p. 310-315.

Clark WJ. Twin block functional therapy. 2nd edition. New York: Elsevier Science Limited; 2002. p. 5-23, 55, 85-95, 101.

Clark W. Design and management of twin blocks: reflections after 30 years of clinical use. Journal of Orthodontics. 2010; 37(3), 209–216.

Premkumar S.Textbook of orthodontics. 1st edition India: Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd; 2015. p. 542-544.

Singaraju GS, Vannala V, Ankisetti SA, Mandava P, Ganugapanta VR, Unnam D. Evaluation of sagittal changes in class II div 2 patients with decelerating phase of growth by powerscope appliance: a retrospective cephalometric investigation. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2019; 11(Suppl 2): S208-S215. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_299_18

Tripathi T, Sigh N, Rai P, Gupta P. Comparison of dentoskeletal changes, esthetic, and functional efficacy of conventional and novel esthetic twin block appliances among class II growing patients: a pilot study. Turk J Orthod 2020; 33(2): 77-84. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19030

Pankaj P, Utreja AK,Sigh SP,Aggarwal A,Jena AK. Effects of twin block appliance treatment on pulmonary functions in class ii malocclusion subjects with retrognathic mandibles. Journal of Orthodontics and Endodontics 2015; 1(1): 1-5.

Santhana. Cephalomteric changes in airway dimensions with twin block therapy in growing Class II patients. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2013 ;5(Suppl1): S25-S29. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.113288

Zhang C, Shen G, Ning Y-J, Liu H, Zhao Y, Liu D-X. Effects of twin-block vs sagittal-guidance twin-block appliance on alveolar bone around mandible incisors in growing patients with class II division 1 malocclusion. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2020; 157(3): 329-339. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.04.029

Ehsani S, Nebbe B, Normando D, Lagravere MO, Flores-Mir C. Short-term treatment effects produces by the Twin-block appliance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod 2015; 37: 170-6. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cju030

Saikoski LZ, Cancado RH, Valarelli FP, de Freitas KM. Dentoskeletal effects of Class II malocclusion treatment with the Twin-block appliance in a Brazilian sample: a prospective study. Dent Press J Orthod 2014; 19(1): 36-45. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.1.036-045.oar

Jankare S,Parchake P,Katole S. Response to twin block treatment. International journal of current research 2020; 12(10): 14358-14362. Doi: http://journalcra.com/article/response-twin-block-treatment-literature-review

Ersin Yildirim. Condylar response to functional therapy with Twin-Block as shown by cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 2014; 84(6): 1018-1025. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2319/112713-869.1

Koretsi V, Zymperdikas V, Papageorgiou SN,Papadopoulos MA. Treatment effects of removable functional appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Orthodontics 2014; 37(4): 418-434. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cju071

Chaudhary et al. Comparative evaluation of soft tissue changes one year posttreatment in Twin Block and FORSUS FRD treated patients. Medica Journal of Armed Forces 2016; 72(4): 362-366. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2015.09.015

Rabie AB, Shum L, Chayanupatkul A . VEGF and bone formation in the glenoid fossa during forward mandible positioning American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2002; 122(2): 202-209. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.125991

Rabie AB,Shen ZZ, Hägg EU, Dr O, Robinson W. Osteogenesis in the glenoid fossa in response to mandibler advancement American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2001; 119 (4): 390-400. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.112875

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

1.
Lubis HF, Idrus E, Sastradipura DFS, Widayati R, Purwanegara MK. Biological Mechanism of Orthodontic Movement in The Treatment of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion Using Twin Block: English. interdental [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 30 [cited 2025 Mar. 12];20(3):395-9. Available from: https://e-journal.unmas.ac.id/index.php/interdental/article/view/9656