Rigor Mortis and Its Management in Dental Autopsy Procedures

Authors

  • Rizki Tanjung Department of Forensic Odontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti
  • Intan Farizka Department of Forensic Odontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti, Indonesia
  • Siti Salsabila Kirana Department of Forensic Odontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti, Indonesia
  • Agnes Elizabeth Yuwono Student of Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti, Indonesia
  • Ailsa Fadhilah Putridwita Student of Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti, Indonesia
  • Aldrina Wulan Eka Suci Student of Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti, Indonesia
  • Elsa Christy Student of Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46862/interdental.v22i1.12851

Keywords:

Rigor mortis, Forensic Odontology, dental autopsi, post-mortem interval, time since death

Abstract

Introduction: Forensic Odontology plays a crucial role in forensic investigations, including determining the postmortem interval (PMI). Rigor mortis is one of the early signs of death, often presenting challenges during oral examinations. Dental autopsy is a procedure that can address these challenges, enabling a thorough examination of the teeth even in the presence of rigor mortis.

Review: Rigor mortis represents a major obstacle in dental autopsy procedures. Muscle stiffness hampers mouth opening and access to the oral cavity. Various techniques can be employed to perform dental autopsies in cases of rigor mortis, such as the use of mouth gags, trismus screws, and myotomy. Jaw resection techniques may also be employed to provide better access to dental structures.

Conclusion: Rigor mortis significantly limits oral cavity access during dental autopsy procedures. Characterized by muscle stiffness, presenting a challenge during dental autopsy examination of the oral cavity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Ugrappa S, Jain A. An overview of the post-mortem interval and its estimation from dental tissues. Annals of RSCB. 2021; 25(4): 14903-10.

2. Rajkumari S, Mensudar R, Naveen N, Thayamunavan B, et al. Estimation of postmortem death interval from autopsied tongue tissue: a cross-sectional study. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2020; 24:568-71.

3. Silva-Chacón ME, Carlos-Erazo AM, Arriola-Guillén LE, De Luca S. Technical note: Validity of a non-destructive device for opening dental arches in rigor mortis cadavers. Forensic Sci Int. 2022 Sep;338:111405. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111405. Epub 2022 Jul 21. PMID: 35914482.

4. Shrestha R, Kanchan T, Krishan K. Methods of estimation of time since death. NCBI Bookshelf. 2020; 1-8.

5. Roy J, Shahu U, Shirpure P, Soni S, et al. A literature review on autopsi dental - an invaluable investigative technique in forensics. Autops Case Rep. 2021; 11: 2-12.

6. J Amendt, et al. Current concepts in forensic entomology. Early postmortem changes and stages of decomposition.DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9684-61. 2010: 1-24.

7. Rajkumari S, Mensudar R, Thayumanavan B, Tamilselvi P. Oral Autopsy - Dental Surgeon's Perspective. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences. 2020;12(1):66-71.

8. Stavrianos C, Dietrich EM, Stavrianos I, Petalotis N. The role of dentistry in the management of mass disasters and bioterrorism. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2010;44(2):110-9

9. Bux R, Heidemann D, Enders M, Bratzke H. The value of examination aids in victim identification: a retrospective study of an airplane crash in Nepal in 2002. Forensic Sci Int. 2006;164(2-3):155-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.12.025 PMid:16439083.

» http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.12.025

10. Sharma D, Koshy G, Garg S, Sharma B, Grover S, Singh M. Oral autopsy, facial reconstruction and virtopsy: An update on endeavors to human identification. RUHSc Journal of Health Sciences. 2017;2(4):199–206. https://doi.org/10.37821/ruhsjhs.2. 4.2017.199-206.

11. Haribhakti VV. Restoration, reconstruction and rehabilitation in head and neck cancer. Springer. 2019.p.8.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2736-0.

12. Aka PS, Canturk N. Aka Canturk oral autopsy method for the dental identification of fetus and infant cases. FMAR. 2014;2(03):48-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/fmar.201 4.23009.

13. American Board of Forensic Odontology (ABFO). Body Identification Information and Guidelines Revise. 2017 Feb.

14. Balaji SM, Balaji PP. Textbook of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery-E Book. New Delhi: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2018.

15. Riquelme-Navarrete J, Gómez L, Sánchez MC, Navarro P, Fonseca GM. A novel conservative technique to allow oral opening and overcome rigor mortis during medicolegal autopsy. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2025 Mar;21(1):63-70. doi: 10.1007/s12024-024-00816-5. Epub 2024 Apr 17. PMID: 38630206.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

1.
Tanjung R, Farizka I, Kirana SS, Yuwono AE, Putridwita AF, Suci AWE, et al. Rigor Mortis and Its Management in Dental Autopsy Procedures. interdental [Internet]. 2026 Apr. 30 [cited 2026 May 1];22(1):104-9. Available from: https://e-journal.unmas.ac.id/index.php/interdental/article/view/12851