Differences in the Accuracy of Age Estimation in Children Using the London Atlas and the Atlas of Dental Development in the Indonesian Population at RSGMP Nala Husada

Authors

  • Shintya Rizki Ayu Agitha Radiology and Odontology Forensic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Hang Tuah, Surabaya
  • Icha Artyas Annariswati Radiology and Odontology Forensic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Hang Tuah, Surabaya
  • Eddy Hermanto Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Hang Tuah, Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46862/interdental.v22i1.12846

Keywords:

ADDIP, AL, Dental age estimation, panoramic, radiograph

Abstract

Introduction: Teeth can be used for age estimation of the victim. Several atlases can be used to estimate age through teeth, such as the London Atlas(AL) and The Atlas of Dental Development in the Indonesian Population(ADDIP). The Atlas of Dental Development in the Indonesian Population (ADDIP) is a modification of the London atlas (AL), made by looking at the process of dental development of children in Indonesia from the age of 5 years to 23 years. Therefore, this study aims to compare the accuracy of child age estimation using the London Atlas (AL) and the Atlas of Dental Development in the Indonesian Population (ADDIP).

Material and Methods: This study used 128 panoramic radiographs from pediatric patients aged 5 years to 16 years at RSGMP Nala Husada Surabaya from February to May 2025. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS software for different tests, including a Wilcoxon test.

Results and Discussions: Using the London Atlas (AL) method, the average difference between chronological age and dental age was found to be between -0.13 and -1.51 years. Meanwhile, according to ADDIP, the average difference between chronological age and dental age was found to be between -0.03 and -1.31 years.

Conclusion: ADDIP shows a smaller difference between chronological age and dental age than the AL, suggesting that ADDIP demonstrated higher accuracy than AL for estimating age in Indonesian children.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Cheong H, Roh BY, Kumagai A, Oh S, Lee SS. Validation of London Atlas for forensic age estimation in Koreans by comparing with Lee’s and Willems’ methods. Heliyon. 2023;9(9):e19957. Doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19957

2. Agitha SRA, Annariswati IA. Dental age estimation methods in children based on radiograph panoramic. J Radiol Dentomaksilofasial Indones 2021; 5(2): 90. Doi: 10.32793/jrdi.v5i2.711

3. Annariswati IA, Agitha SRA. Age estimation accuracy based on Atlas London and Schour-Massler in Tionghoa ethnic children. J Radiol Dentomaksilofasial Indones. 2021; 5(2): 52. Doi: 10.32793/jrdi.v5i2.704

4. Sousa AM da S, Jacometti V, AlQahtani S, Silva RHA da. Age estimation of Brazilian individuals using the London Atlas. Archives of oral biology 2020; 113: 104705. Doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2020.104705

5. Setyari A, Soedarsono N. Age estimation of individuals aged 5 – 23 years based on dental development of the Indonesian population. Forensic Sciences Research 2022; 7(2): 115–23. Doi: 10.1080/20961790.2021.1995023

6. Paz Cortés MM, Rojo R, Alía García E, Mourelle Martínez MR. Accuracy assessment of dental age estimation with the Willems, Demirjian and Nolla methods in Spanish children: Comparative cross-sectional study. BMC pediatrics 2020; 20(1): 361. Doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02255-5

7. AlOtaibi NN, AlQahtani SJ. Performance of different dental age estimation methods on Saudi children. The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology. 2023;41(1):27–46.

8. Ghafari R, Ghodousi A, Poordavar E. Comparison of the accuracy of the London atlas and Smith method in dental age estimation in 5-15.99-year-old Iranians using the panoramic view. International journal of legal medicine 2019; 133(1): 189–95. Doi: 10.1007/s00414-018-1920-3

9. Rusydiana F, Oscandar F, Sam B. Identifikasi usia berdasarkan metode Al Qahtani melalui radiograf panoramik di RSGM FKG UNPAD Age identification based on Al Qahtani method through panoramic radiograph at the Dental Hospital of Universitas Padjadjaran. Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Padjadjaran 2016; 28(3): 166-171. Doi:10.24198/jkg.v28i3.18695

10. Kurniawan A, Agitha S, Chusida A, Rizky B, Prakoeswa B, Nailah S, et al. Accuracy of Tooth Development as an Indicator of Dental Age Estimation for Children in Indonesia. e-GiGi 2022; 10(1): 144. Doi: 10.35790/eg.v10i1.39553

11. Sharma P, Wadhwan V. Comparison of accuracy of age estimation in Indian children by measurement of open apices in teeth with the London Atlas of tooth development. The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology 2020; 38(1): 39–47.

12. Swastirani A, Utomo H, MAR MS. Estimasi usia dengan orthopantomogram pada pasien Rumah Sakit Gigi Dan Mulut Pendidikan Universitas Airlangga. E-Prodenta Journal of Dentistry 2018; 2(1): 124–9. Doi: 10.21776/ub.eprodenta.2018.002.01.4

13. Kusumadewi S, Kristanto R, Nurrahmadhanti D. Tingkat akurasi penentuan usia kronologis dan usia gigi menggunakan metode Cameriere pada anak usia 5-15 tahun di Bali. JMU 2023; 12(5): 81. Doi:10.24843/mu.2023.v12.i05.p12

14. Prakoeswa BFWR, Kurniawan A, Chusida A, Rizky BN, Darmawan AI, Aisyah AKN, et al. Using the Demirjian method for estimating the dental age of children in Surabaya, Indonesia. Dental Journal 2023; 56(2): 87–91. Doi: 10.20473/j.djmkg.v56.i2.p87-91

15. Sosiawan A, Chusida A, Prakoeswa BFWR, Kurniawan A, Marini MI, Rizky BN, et al. Estimation of children’s age based on dentition via panoramic radiography in Surabaya, Indonesia. Dental Journal 2022; 55: 161–4. Doi: 10.20473/j.djmkg.v55.i3.p161-164

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

1.
Agitha SRA, Annariswati IA, Hermanto E. Differences in the Accuracy of Age Estimation in Children Using the London Atlas and the Atlas of Dental Development in the Indonesian Population at RSGMP Nala Husada. interdental [Internet]. 2026 Apr. 30 [cited 2026 May 1];22(1):1-8. Available from: https://e-journal.unmas.ac.id/index.php/interdental/article/view/12846