The Influence of Biologic Width on Altered Passive Eruption Treatment

Authors

  • Vidya Nursolihati Department of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Marie Louisa Department of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46862/interdental.v22i2.11668

Keywords:

Altered passive eruption, biologic width, crown lengthening, gummy smile

Abstract

Introduction: Altered passive eruption (APE) is a condition in which the relationship between teeth, alveolar bone, and soft tissues creates an excessive display of gingiva, generally known as a gummy smile. Coslet classified APE into four case types, based on the gingival and osseous relationships. The treatment options can be determined based on its classification and considering the concept of biologic width.

Case: This case report presents two cases of APE type 1A. The first case is a 36‑year‑old, systemically healthy, non‑smoking female with a complaint of gummy smile after orthodontic treatment five years ago. The second case is a 19‑year‑old, systemically healthy, non‑smoking female with a complaint of short teeth and uneven gingival margins.

Case Treatment: The first case was treated with a combination of soft and hard tissue crown lengthening, while the second case was treated with only soft tissue crown lengthening.

Discussion: Various crown lengthening techniques must be carried out without disturbing the biologic width.  In the first case, although based on the examination it was classified as APE type 1A with gingivectomy treatment, there was a change in the gingival margin position so the distance to the crest of the alveolar bone was < 3 mm. Therefore, flap elevation and ostectomy were performed.

Conclusion: In treating APE, biologic width is one of the most important factors to be considered, along with the amount of attached gingiva and the distance of the alveolar crest to the CEJ. Maintaining biologic width is crucial for gingival health and stable treatment outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Ragghianti MS, Veronesi GF, Cardoso MV, Michel RC, Damante CA, Sant’Ana ACP, et al. Altered Active and Passive Eruption: A Modified Classification. Clin Adv Periodontics. 2017;7(1):51–56. DOI:10.1902/cap.2016.160025.

2. Alpiste-Illueca F. Altered passive eruption (APE): A little -known clinical situation. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011;16(1):e100-4. DOI:10.4317/medoral.16.e100.

3. Coslet JG, Vanarsdall R, Weisgold A. Diagnosis and classification of delayed passive eruption of the dentogingival junction in the adult. Alpha Omegan 1977;70(3):24–8.

4. Mele M, Felice P, Sharma P, Mazzotti C, Bellone P, Zucchelli G. Esthetic treatment of altered passive eruption. Periodontol 2000. 2018;77(1):65–83. DOI:10.1111/prd.12206.

5. Marzadori M, Stefanini M, Sangiorgi M, Mounssif I, Monaco C, Zucchelli G. Crown lengthening and restorative procedures in the esthetic zone. Periodontol 2000. 2018;77(1):84–92. DOI:10.1111/prd.12208.

6. Arora S, Gupta G, Parimoo R. Clinical significance of biological width in crown lengthening. Int J Health Sci. 2021;5(Suppl 2):285–289. DOI:10.53730/ijhs.v5nS2.5773

7. Gargiulo AW, Wentz FM, Orban B. Dimensions and relations of the dentogingival junction in humans. J Periodontol 1961;32(3):261–267. DOI:10.1902/jop.1961.32.3.261.

8. Jepsen S, Caton JG, Albandar JM, Bissada NF, Bouchard P, Cortellini P, et al. Periodontal manifestations of systemic diseases and developmental and acquired conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 3 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri‐Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Periodontol. 2018;89(Suppl 1): S237-S248. DOI:10.1002/JPER.17-0733.

9. Carvalho BAS, Duarte CAB, Silva JF, Batista WWS, Douglas-de-Oliveira DW, de Oliveira ES, et al. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the periodontium with biologic width invasion. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):116. DOI:10.1186/s12903-020-01101-x.

10. Garber DA, Salama MA. The aesthetic smile: diagnosis and treatment. Periodontol 2000. 1996;11:18–28. DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0757.1996.tb00179.x.

11. Ulfah N, Wijaksana IKE. Gummy smile treatment by aesthetic crown lengthening on altered passive eruption case. Acta Med Philipp. 2021;55(8):860–864. DOI:10.47895/amp.v55i8.2122

12. Sharma N, Khuller N. Biologic width: Evaluation and correction of its violation. J Oral Health Comm Dent. 2009;3(1):20–25. DOI:10.5005/johcd-3-1-20.

13. Nursolihati V, Hafiyyah OA. Functional crown lengthening as a pre-restorative procedure in the aesthetic zone. Interdental Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi (IJKG) 2024;20(1):149–155. DOI:10.46862/interdental.v20i1.7863

14. Gupta G, Gupta R, Gupta N, Gupta U. Crown lengthening procedures-A review article. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2015;14(4):22–37. DOI:10.9790/0853-14412737.

15. Hempton TJ, Dominici JT. Contemporary crown-lengthening therapy: A review. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010;141(6):647–655. DOI:10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0252.

16. Domínguez E, Pascual-La Rocca A, Valles C, Carrió N, Montagut L, Alemany AS, et al. Stability of the gingival margin after an aesthetic crown lengthening procedure in the anterior region by means of a replaced flap and buccal osseous surgery: A prospective study. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(10):3633–3640. DOI:10.1007/s00784-020-03239-y

Downloads

Published

2026-08-12

How to Cite

1.
Nursolihati V, Louisa M. The Influence of Biologic Width on Altered Passive Eruption Treatment. interdental [Internet]. 2026 Aug. 12 [cited 2026 Aug. 13];22(2):438-45. Available from: https://e-journal.unmas.ac.id/index.php/interdental/article/view/11668