A Critical Discourse Analysis on Barack Obama’s Speech To the Congress


  • Maksimianus Didimus Jehadu Universitas Mahasaraswati,Fakultas Bahasa Asing Denpasar
  • I Komang Sulatra
  • I Gusti Agung Sri Rwa Jayantini




Didimus Jehadu. Maksimianus 2020. A Critical Discourse Analysis on Barack Obama Speech to the Congress. English Study Program, faculty of Foreign Languages, Mahasaraswati Denpasar University. Supervisor: I Komang Sulatra S.SM. Hum; Co- supervisor: Dr. I Gusti Agung Sri Rwa Jayantini.S.S.M.Hum.


            The aims of the study are to find the Critical Discourse and language used by the Barack Obama Speech To the congress. Discourse is known as spoken or written language in a social context. The theory of types Critical discourse analysis (henceforth CDA) subsumes a variety of approaches towards the social analysis of discourse (Fairclough and Wodak 1997, Pecheuk M. 1982, Wodak and Meyer 2001.  The objectives of this study were finding the structure of the next and describing the ideology that applied on Barack Obama Speech. This study used qualitative approach in relation to the use of clear and systematic description about the phenomena being studied.

            Based on the analysis, it is found that there are fiftythree Fourteen Barack Obama Speech there are structur Obama Speech Genre (26,41%), Framing (16,98%), Backgrounding/Foregrounding (3,77%), Presuposition (5,66%), Topicalisation (9,43%), Agency (3,77%), Delition/Ommision (1,88%), Insinuation (1,88%), Connotation (1,88%), Register (3,77%), Modality (11,32%), Opening (5,66%), Content(3,77%), Closing(3,77%). As the result of this analysis all the structural aspect of the theory are applied in Barack Obama Speech text to the congress, Can (1,1%), Could (1,1%), Would (3,5%), Must (20,2%), Will (64,2%), Should (9,5%).


Barrak Obama’s to congres Speech (http://ww.cnn.com/2010.02/20/politics/Barac k-ObamaSpeech-Transcript-full-text/ index html.

Carlin, theories of media. Discourse. Retrived November 7 (http://csmt.uchico.edu/glosary 2004discourse htm).

Cahyono, 1986. Konsep Ideologi Pancasila. Bandung

Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Editions one United State of America: Logman, publishing. retrieve. November 23.

Fairclough, N and Wodak, R. 1997. Critical discourse analysis: Discourse as Social Interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Fairclough, Norman. 2001. Language and Power. Two edition. Roudledge Publisher.

Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analizing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research.

Haliday M.A.K and Hasan, R. 1985. Language, Context, and Text: Aspect of Language in a Social Semiotic Perspective. Deakin University Press.

Hidayat, Dedy.2001. Pancasila sebagai ideologi dalam berbagai bidang kehidupan. Yogyakarta: Penerbit buku baik.

Huckin, Thomas. 1997. Critical Discourse Analysis in T. Miller, functional approaches to written text: classroom applications. Washington, D.C: United State Information Agency.

Heywod A. 1998. Political Ideologies: An Introduction. Second edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave.


Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary,2013.edition

Malmkjaer, Kristen.1991.Genre Analisys.The Linguistic Encyclopedia.London and Newyork: Roudledge

Nugraha, Rifky. 2014. A Critical Discourse Analysis on Hillary Clinton's Speech “American for Marriage Equality”. Jakarta: English Letter Department Adap and Humanities Faculty State Islamic University Syariff-Lidaytullah

Priatmoko F.X.Nova. 2013. A Critical Discourse Analysis of Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono’sSpeech. Semarang: English Department Faculty of Humanities Dian Nuswantoro University.

Pecheux, M. 1982. Language, Semantic and Ideology. New York: St. Martin's Press.

Satiardja, Gunawan2001. Pancasila sebagai dasar Ideologi Bangsa. Jakarta: Mondial Nusa Grafika.

Taylor, J. R and Van Every, E. J. 1993. The Vulnerable Fortmess: Bureaucrative Organization and Management in the Formation age. Toronto: University of Toronto

Van Djik, T.A. 1997. Discourse Study. A multidiscriplinary Introduction. London: Sage .

Van Djik, T.A. 1998. Ideology. London: Sage

Wodak, R and Meyer, M. 2001. Method of Critical Discourse Analysis. Great Britain: Sage.

Wodak, Ruth. 1989. Language Power and Ideology. Amsterdam: Jhon Benjamins

Wang, Junling. 2010. A Critical Discourse Analysis of Barrack Obama Speeches. China: Langzhou, School of Foreign Language, Norwets Normal University. Retrived November 6 (www.Academy publication.com).

Yule,1996. Pragmatics. Oxford University. Press.