Navigating Challenge and Commitment: A Domain-Functional Analysis of Discourse Markers in Zohran Mamdani’s Al Jazeera Interview

Authors

  • Putu Nur Ayomi Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36733/sphota.v18i2.15026

Keywords:

discourse markers, domain-function model, disfluency, political interview, Zohran Mamdani

Abstract

In unscripted talk, speakers constantly signal how each utterance connects to earlier talk and how the listener should receive it. Small expressions known as discourse markers (DMs), carry much of this work. This study investigates the DMs produced by the interviewer and by New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani in an Al Jazeera English interview broadcast to mark his first 100 days in office. The data consist of a 4,109-word transcript prepared from the YouTube recording. The analysis applies Crible’s two-dimensional domain-function model, which places each DM in one of four domains (ideational, rhetorical, sequential, and interpersonal) and assigns it a specific function, while also paying attention to the disfluencies, such as repetitions, that accompany DMs in spontaneous speech. A total of 200 DM tokens were identified: 60 from the interviewer and 140 from the mayor. For both speakers the sequential domain was the largest, followed by the rhetorical, ideational, and interpersonal domains. The interviewer’s DMs leaned toward the rhetorical domain, largely through I mean when framing critical questions, whereas the mayor’s DMs leaned toward the ideational and interpersonal domains for supplying reasons, softening answers that departed from the question, and opening personal stories. The forms but, so, and well moved across domains within the same interview. The findings show that a two-dimensional model reveals interactional detail in political interview talk that single-level DM classifications tend to overlook

References

Al Jazeera English. (2026). Zohran Mamdani on Trump, Iran war and the future of the Democratic Party | Talk to Al Jazeera [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sz-hcLqzsC0

Arianto, R., & Ayomi, P. N. (2023). Deixis found in Kobe Bryant interview entitled “Love What You Do”. Austronesian: Journal of Language Science & Literature, 2(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.59011/austronesian.2.1.2023.32-41

Ayomi, P. N., Pratiwi, D. P. E., & Krismayani, N. W. (2025). Detecting linguistic characteristics of political disinformation in Indonesian social media: Insights from systemic functional linguistics. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 16(3), 838–848. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1603.14

Crible, L. (2017). Discourse markers and (dis)fluency in English and French: Variation and combination in the DisFrEn corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(2), 242–269. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22.2.04cri

Crible, L. (2018). Discourse markers and (dis)fluency: Forms and functions across languages and registers. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.286

Crible, L., & Degand, L. (2019a). Domains and functions: A two-dimensional account of discourse markers. Discours, 24, 3–35. https://doi.org/10.4000/discours.9997

Crible, L., & Degand, L. (2019b). Reliability vs. granularity in discourse annotation: What is the trade-off? Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 15(1), 71–99. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2016-0046

Crible, L., Degand, L., & Gilquin, G. (2017). The clustering of discourse markers and filled pauses: A corpus-based French-English study of (dis)fluency. Languages in Contrast, 17(1), 69–95. https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.17.1.04cri

Crible, L., & Pascual, E. (2020). Combinations of discourse markers with repairs and repetitions in English, French and Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 156, 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.002

Dewi, N. K. I. S., & Ayomi, P. N. (2024). Use of discourse markers “okay” and “so” by Indonesian teacher in bilingual elementary school: A case study of Tunjung Sari School in Bali. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 11(2), 532–542. https://ethicallingua.org/25409190/article/view/777

Faisal, W. M. (2023). The discourse marker (well) in selected talk shows: A discourse analysis study. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences & Humanities, 13(1), 254-262, DOI: http://doi.org/10.37648/ijrssh.v13i01.021

Farahani, M. V., & Ghane, Z. (2022). Unpacking the function(s) of discourse markers in academic spoken English: A corpus-based study. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 45(1), 49–70.

Fraser, B. (1999). What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics, 31(7), 931–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00101-5

Fu, Y. (2024). A comparative analysis of the use of the discourse marker ‘but’ in a British televised political interview show: A socio-pragmatic perspective. Corpus-based Studies across Humanities. https://doi.org/10.1515/csh-2024-0011

Fu, Y. (2026). Discourse marker “but” in political interviews: A socio-pragmatic comparative study. East Asian Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.3138/eap-2024-0220

Fu, Y., Afzaal, M., & El-Dakhs, D. A. S. (2024). Investigating discourse markers “you know” and “I mean” in mediatized English political interviews: A corpus-based comparative study. Frontiers in Communication, 9, 1427062. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1427062

Fu, Y., & Ho, V. (2022). Discourse markers in TV interviews: A corpus-based comparative study of Chinese and the western media. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1063158. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1063158

Fuller, J. M. (2003). The influence of speaker roles on discourse marker use. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00065-6

Guydish, A. J., Nguyen, A., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2024). Discourse markers in small talk and tasks. Discourse Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456241230253

Heine, B., Kaltenböck, G., Kuteva, T., & Long, H. (2021). The rise of discourse markers. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108982856

Kosmala, L., & Crible, L. (2022). The dual status of filled pauses: Evidence from genre, proficiency and co-occurrence. Language and Speech, 65(1), 216–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309211010862

Wibhisana, M. D., Ayomi, P. N., & Maharani, N. P. D. (2023). Language, ideology, and power in Kamala Harris’s speech: Critical discourse analysis. ELYSIAN JOURNAL: English Literature, Linguistics and Translation Studies, 3(1), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.36733/elysian.v3i1.4323

Nur, F. D., Adriati, R., & De Lores, L. M. (2023). Discourse markers in Vogue’s 73 Questions with Adele. JELL (Journal of English Language and Literature) STIBA-IEC Jakarta, 8(1), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.37110/jell.v8i1.175

Putri, N. P. W., & Ayomi, P. N. (2025). The use of causal conjunction found in “Bali Sun” e-news articles. ELYSIAN JOURNAL: English Literature, Linguistics and Translation Studies, 5(4), 356–365. https://doi.org/10.36733/elysian.v5i4.12223

Ratnadi, I. G. N., Ayomi, P. N., & Maharani, P. D. (2022). Talk show hosting turn-allocation techniques in Jimmy Kimmel Live. Journal of Language and Literature, 22(2), 306–317. https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v22i2.4365

Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge University Press.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Xhaferri, G., et al. (2024). The role and function of discourse markers: Examples from a YouTube interview. Palimpsest, [9]([17), [69-78].

.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

Ayomi, P. N. (2026). Navigating Challenge and Commitment: A Domain-Functional Analysis of Discourse Markers in Zohran Mamdani’s Al Jazeera Interview. SPHOTA: Jurnal Linguistik Dan Sastra, 18(2), 250–262. https://doi.org/10.36733/sphota.v18i2.15026