Perilaku Biaya Asimetris Pada Perusahaan Perbankan Yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia

Authors

  • Jems Arison Zacharias Universitas Kristen Artha Wacana

Keywords:

Anti-Sticky Cost, Asymmetric Cost Behavior, Banking Companies, Sticky Cost

Abstract

This research was conducted to examine the of asymmetric costs behaviour in banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX), especially sticky costs on administrative and general expenses and anti-sticky costs on interest expenses. The method used to test the research hypothesis is multiple linear regression analysis with the Anderson, Banker, Janakiraman (ABJ) model. The population for this study were all banking companies listed on the IDX and the sample selection was carried out using a purposive sampling method with an observation period during the 2018-2021 period. The results of the study show that sticky costs occur in administrative and general expenses in banking companies in which the rate of increase of general and administrative expenses when income increases are much greater than the rate of decrease in the equivalent amount. Meanwhile, anti-sticky cost behaviour occurs in interest expenses in banking companies in which the magnitude of the increase in administrative and general expenses when income increases is much smaller than the magnitude of the rate of decrease in an equivalent amount. The results of this study are in accordance with the theory of cost adjustments and managerial decisions in which managers will adopt policies that can provide the best profit with the smallest risk for banks when making adjustments to resources and costs that are sticky.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abu-Serdaneh, J. (2014). The Asymmetrical Behavior of Cost: Evidence from Jordan. International Business Research, 7(8). https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v7n8p113

Amare, A. (2021). Capital structure and profitability: Panel data evidence of private banks in Ethiopia. Cogent Economics and Finance, 9(1), 0–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2021.1953736

Anderson, M. C., Banker, R. D., & Janakiraman, S. N. (2003). Are Selling, General, and Administrative Costs “Sticky”? Journal of Accounting Research, 41(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00095

Banker, R. D., & Byzalov, D. (2014). Asymmetric cost behavior. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(2), 43–79. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-50846

Cannon, J. N. (2014). Determinants of “sticky costs”: An analysis of cost behavior using United States air transportation industry data. Accounting Review, 89(5), 1645–1672. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50806

Eltivia, N., Ekasari, K., Wahyuni, H., & Isrowiyah, A. (2019). How Adjustment Cost Relate with. Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 9(3), 319–326. https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v9i3.64

Holzhacker, M., Krishnan, R., & Mahlendorf, M. D. (2015). Unraveling the black box of cost behavior: An empirical investigation of risk drivers, managerial resource procurement, and cost elasticity. Accounting Review, 90(6), 2305–2335. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51092

Krisnadewi, K. A., Niroula, B., & Singh, S. K. (2021). Research on Cost Stickiness in International Journals: A Bibliometric Study. AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi, 13(2), 144–158. https://doi.org/10.26740/jaj.v13n2.p144-158

Mandour, M. (2021). Financial Risk and Cost Stickiness: Evidence From Egypt. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 11(2), 46. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijafr.v11i2.18751

Mehzabin, S., Shahriar, A., Hoque, M. N., Wanke, P., & Azad, M. A. K. (2022). The effect of capital structure, operating efficiency and non-interest income on bank profitability: new evidence from Asia. Asian Journal of Economics and Banking. https://doi.org/10.1108/ajeb-03-2022-0036

Onel, G. (2018). Adjustment costs and threshold effects in factor demand relationships. Applied Economics, 50(18), 2070–2086. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1388908

Pinasti, W. F., & Mustikawati, R. I. (2018). Pengaruh Car, Bopo, Npl, Nim Dan Ldr Terhadap Profitabilitas Bank Umum Periode 2011-2015. Nominal, Barometer Riset Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/nominal.v7i1.19365

Ratnawati, L., & Nugrahanti, Y. W. (2015). Perilaku Sticky Cost Biaya Penjualan , Biaya Administrasi Dan Umum Serta Manufaktur. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, XVIII(2), 65–80.

Rio & Reynoso. (2018). The deceitfulness of sticky cost on banking systems. Journal of Accounting, Business and Management, 25(2), 61-80. https://doi.org/10.31966/jabminternational.v25i2.357.

Safitri, D. P., & Kristianti, I. (2022). Analisis perilaku Sticky Cost biaya produksi pada perusahaan BUMN sektor manufaktur periode 2014-2020. Owner, 6(2), 2059–2070. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v6i2.835

Saputra, H. J., & Purwanto, S. A. (2022). Perilaku Biaya (Cost Behavior) : Analisis Komparatif Melalui Pendekatan Teoritis Dan Praktik. Change Agent For Management Journal (CAM), 6(1), 33. http://jurnal.umberau.ac.id/index.php/camjournal

Vonna, S. R., & Daud, R. M. (2016). Analisis Perilaku Sticky Cost pada Biaya Produksi dan Non-produksi (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2011-2014 ). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi (JIMEKA), 1(1), 120–132.

Wahdan, M. A., Ahmed, A. K., & Alsayed, M. S. H. (2021). Does Sticky Cost Behavior Affect Earnings Quality? Evidence From Egypt. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 11(2), 17. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijafr.v11i2.18634

Wang, R., Wang, H., & Chen, Y. (2021). COVID-19 Shock and Interest Expense Stickiness: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2021.1990750

Weiss, D. (2010). Cost behavior and analysts’ earnings forecasts. Accounting Review, 85(4), 1441–1471. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.4.1441

Windyastuti. (2014). Derajat Cost Stickiness Sektor Perbankan dan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 18(3), 497–504. http://jurkubank.wordpress.com

Windyastuti, W., Sunaryo, K., & Hastuti, S. (2017). Respon Investor Terhadap Pengumuman Laba Industri Perbankan Yang Menghadapi Kos Stickiness. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 21(1), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.26905/jkdp.v21i1.1233

Downloads

Published

2023-03-30