Pengaturan Hukum Perampasan Aset Terpidana Korupsi Dalam Perspektif Perbandingan Hukum Negara Indonesia Dan Singapura
Keywords:
Asset Confiscation, Corruption, Comparative Law, Indonesia, SingaporeAbstract
Corruption is an extraordinary crime that not only causes financial losses to the state but also hinders national development and public welfare. One of the essential measures in combating corruption is the confiscation of assets derived from criminal activities to recover state losses. This study aims to analyze the urgency of asset confiscation regulations in addressing corruption in Indonesia and to formulate an ideal regulatory framework through a comparative analysis with Singapore’s legal system. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The findings indicate that Indonesia’s asset confiscation framework still faces various challenges, particularly regarding the effectiveness of recovering assets obtained through corruption. In contrast, Singapore has implemented a more integrated and effective mechanism for asset tracing and confiscation. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen regulations, institutional frameworks, and inter agency coordination to enhance the effectiveness of corruption eradication and the recovery of state assets.
References
Adrian Sutedi. 2012. Hukum Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Anak Agung Adi Lestari & Ni Putu Noni Suharyanti. 2020. Kebijakan Pemerintah Indonesia Dalam Pengembangan Pariwisata. Jurnal Hukum Saraswati, 2(2).
Andi Hamzah. 2015. Pemberantasan Korupsi Melalui Hukum Pidana Nasional dan Internasional. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Andrew Ashworth. 2013. Human Rights, Serious Crime and Criminal Procedure. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
Barda Nawawi Arief. 2011. Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana.
Eddy O.S. Hiariej. 2009. Pengantar Hukum Pidana Internasional. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Evi Hartanti. 2004. Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Feri Amsari. 2020. Reformasi Hukum dan Pemberantasan Korupsi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
H.A.L. Hasibuan. 2025. Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Rechtsvinding, 14(1).
Jeremy Pope. 2000. Confronting Corruption. Berlin: Transparency International.
M. Syamsa Ardisasmita. 2016. Pengembalian Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Hukum KPK.
Manfred Nowak. 2005. U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: CCPR Commentary. Kehl: N.P. Engel.
Muladi. 2002. Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Orin Gusta Andini et al. 2025. Human Rights Protection for Third Parties in Non Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture. Fiat Justisia.
Robert Klitgaard. 1988. Controlling Corruption. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Romli Atmasasmita. 2012. Strategi Pemberantasan Korupsi. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Saleh et al. 2023. Asset Recovery Policy in the Draft of Asset Forfeiture Bill. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia.
Singapura. Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act.
Tan Cheng Han. 2018. The Law of Corruption in Singapore. Singapore: LexisNexis.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). 2015. Corruption and Human Rights. Vienna.
Yenti Garnasih. 2016. Penegakan Hukum Anti Pencucian Uang. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Yunus Husein. 2012. Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Yunus Husein. 2019. Negara dan Pemberantasan Korupsi melalui Pendekatan Anti Pencucian Uang. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Zainal Arifin Mochtar. 2016. Anti Korupsi: Teori dan Praktik. Yogyakarta: UII Press.