Analisis Yuridis Perampasan Aset Dengan Konsep Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture (NCBAF) Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dan Pencucian Uang
Keywords:
Asset Forfeiture, NCBAF, Corruption, Money LaunderingAbstract
The return of state assets resulting from corruption and money laundering in Indonesia is still relatively low. This is caused by the dependence of the legal system on the concept of Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture (CBAF) which requires a criminal verdict against the perpetrator. Legal problems arise when the perpetrator dies, flees, or is incompetent to stand trial, causing a legal vacuum in asset execution. This study aims to analyze the urgency and mechanism of Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture (NCBAF) as a legal solution. The research method used is normative juridical with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The results of the study indicate that the application of NCBAF allows asset forfeiture through in rem (civil) lawsuits against the asset itself without waiting for the conviction of the perpetrator. This concept applies the principle of shifting burden of proof and preponderance of evidence. The ratification of the Asset Forfeiture Bill which accommodates NCBAF is a necessity to harmonize national law with UNCAC and increase the effectiveness of state financial recovery.
References
Anandya, Diky, dan Kurnia Ramdhana, Laporan Hasil Pemantauan Tren Penindakan Kasus Korupsi Tahun 2023 (Jakarta: Indonesia Corruption Watch, 2024)
Arifin, Ridwan, ‘Asset Recovery in Indonesia: A Study on the Implementation of Non- Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture’, Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 4.1 (2019), 22
Cassella, Stefan D., Asset Forfeiture Law in the United States, 2nd edn (Huntington: JurisNet LLC, 2013)
Diantha, I Made Pasek, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum (Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2016)
Hengki, I usti Bagus Hari, I Made Kariyasa, dan A.A.A. Lestari, ‘Peran Perempuan Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Melalui Preventif Normatif
Yuridis’, Jurnal Analisis Hukum, 4.1 (2021), 35
Hiariej, Eddy O.S., ‘Konsep Perampasan Aset Tanpa Pemidanaan dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Indonesia’, Jurnal Hukum Nasional, 8.2 (2021), 98
Husein, Yunus, Negara Memiskinkan Koruptor: Kajian Perampasan Aset Koruptor di Indonesia (Jakarta: Publisitas, 2019)
Kariyasa, I Made, ‘Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Perihal Penahanan di Indonesia’, Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 9.9 (2021), 1520
Mamesah, Calvin Nicolaas, Emma Valentina Teresha Senewe, dan Natalia Lana Lengkong, ‘Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Kasus Korupsi Sebagai Implementasi The United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) Di Indonesia’, Lex Privatum, 14.3 (2024)
Pakpahan, S., dan Hartono, ‘Penerapan Pembuktian Terbalik dalam Pengembalian Aset Korupsi’, Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan, 48.1 (2018), 102
Perbawa, I Ketut Sukewati Lanang Putra, Perancangan Peraturan Perundang- undangan (Legal Drafting) (Denpasar: Universitas Mahasaraswati Press, 2021)
Perbawa, I Ketut Sukewati Lanang Putra, dan Maheswara Perbawa Sukawati, ‘Legal Assistance For The Poor’, Ganaya: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 3.1 (2020)
Posner, Richard A., Economic Analysis of Law, 9th edn (New York: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2014)