Pengaruh Tarikan Guna Lahan SPBU Terhadap Kinerja Jalan Talangagung
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36733/alamlestari.v9i2.9545Keywords:
Attraction Generation Model, Traffic Volume, Road Network Land Use InteractionAbstract
Di setiap daerah, terutama di daerah yang sedang berkembang, transportasi memainkan peran penting dalam kegiatan ekonomi. Kecamatan Kepanjen, salah satu kecamatan di Kabupaten Malang, berfungsi sebagai pusat kegiatan lokal di wilayah tersebut. Salah satu jalan kolektor utama di Kecamatan Kepanjen adalah Jalan Talangagung yang menghubungkan Kecamatan Kepanjen dengan Kota Blitar. Ruas jalan ini digunakan untuk beberapa keperluan, salah satunya adalah SPBU. Menentukan model intreaksi dan dampak interaksi SPBU di Talangagung terhadap tingkat pelayanan jalan Talangagung merupakan tujuan dari penelitian ini. Analisis korelasi akan menjadi metode awal yang digunakan, diikuti dengan analisis linier berganda. Dengan demikian, sebuah model akan dibuat, dan disimulasi yang berasal dari model tersebut. Model SPBU yang dihasilkan adalah YSPBU = 1.526 + 1.159 (X2) dengan nilai R2weekday = 0.864 dan nilai R2 weekend = 0.832 (X4). Kuantitas kunjungan merupakan faktor yang mempengaruhi. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa dampak rata-rata SPBU terhadap volume Jalan Talangagung adalah 8,56%, dan terbesar pada weekday. Di sisi lain, SPBU memiliki pengaruh rata-rata 7,61% terhadap volume Jalan Talangagung pada weekend.
References
Agustin, I. W., & Waloeya, B. S. (2017). Trip Attraction Model of Land Use for Industrial Area. IPTEK Journal of Proceedings Series, 3(6).
Batty, M. (1976). Urban modelling: Algorithms, calibrations, predictions. London: Cambridge University Press.
Batty, M., & Mackie, S. (1972). The calibration of gravity, entropy, and related models of spatial interaction. Environment and Planning A, 4(2), 205–233.
Birkin, M., & Clarke, G. P. (1991). Spatial interaction in geography. Geography Review, 4 (5), 16–21.
Cordey-Hayes, M. C., & Wilson, A. G. (1971). Spatial interaction. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 5(1), 73–95.
Dennett, A. (2018). Modelling population flows using spatial interaction models. Australian Population Studies. https://doi.org/10.37970/aps.v2i2.38.
Dennett, A., & Wilson, A. (2013). A multilevel spatial interaction modelling framework for estimating interregional migration in Europe. Environment and Planning A. https://doi.org/10.1068/a45398.
Foster and Partners Ltd et al. (2016). Report describing and documenting the main options of the integrated development plan of the metropolitan pole of Elliniko - Agios Kosmas (in Greek).
Fotheringham, A. S. (1983). A new set of spatial-interaction models: The theory of competing destinations. Environment & Planning A, 15, 15–36.
Harahap, F. R. (2013). Dampak urbanisasi bagi perkembangan kota di Indonesia. Society, 1(1) , 35-45.
Harland, K., & Stillwell, J. (2010). Commuting to school: A new spatial interaction modelling framework. In J. Stillwell, O. Duke-Williams, & A. Dennett (Eds.), Technologies for migration and commuting analysis: Spatial interaction data applications (pp. 294–315). IGI Global.
Huff, D. L. (1964). Defining and estimating a trading area. Journal of Marketing, 28(3), 34.
Hunt, J. D. (1994). Calibrating the Naples land-use and transport model. Environment and Planning B, 21, 569–590.
Inayah, W., Agustin, I. W., & Waloejo, B. S. (2023). KINERJA JALAN RAYA TANAH MERAH KABUPATEN BANGKALAN. Planning for Urban Region and Environment Journal (PURE), 12(2), 1-8.
Jin, Y., Echenique, M., Wegener, M., & Batty, M. (Eds.). (2023). Applied urban modelling. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
Kadarisman, M., Gunawan, A., & Ismiyati, I. (2016). Kebijakan Manajemen Transportasi darat dan dampaknya terhadap perekonomian masyarakat di Kota Depok. Jurnal Manajemen Transportasi & Logistik (JMTranslog), 3(1), 41-58.
Lautso, K., et al. (2004). PROPOLIS: Planning and research of policies for land use and transport for increasing urban sustainability, EVK4-1999-00005. Brussels, BE: European Commission. https://www.spiekermann-wegener.de/pro/pdf/PROPOLIS_Final_R eport.pdf.
Lowry, I. S. (1964). A model of metropolis, Rand Corporation RM-4125-RC, Santa Monica CA. Available at: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_memoranda/RM 4035.html (Accessed: 25 July 2021).
Malavenda, G. A., Musolino, G., Rindone, C., & Vitetta, A. (2020). Residential location, mobility, and travel time: A pilot study in a small-size Italian metropolitan area. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 11, 8827466.
O’Kelly, M. E. (1986). Activity levels at hub facilities in interacting networks. Geographical Analysis, 18(4), 343–356.
Pozoukidou, G. (2014). Land use transport interaction models: Application perspectives for the City of Thessaloniki. Spatium, 1(32), 7–14.
Pradhan, R. P., Arvin, M. B., & Nair, M. (2021). Urbanization, transportation infrastructure, ICT, and economic growth: A temporal causal analysis. Cities, 115, 103213.
Raymer, J., Bonaguidi, A., & Valentini, A. (2006). Describing and projecting the age and spatial structures of interregional migration in Italy. Population, Space and Place, 12 (5), 371–388.
Roflin, E., & Zulvia, F. E. (2021). Kupas tuntas analisis korelasi. Penerbit NEM.
Statista. (2021). Urbanization by Continent 2021. Available at: https://www.statista. com/statistics/270860/urbanization-by-continent/ (Accessed: 9 February 2022).
Tamin, O. Z. (2000). Perencanaan dan Pemodelan Transportasi.
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2018). 68% of the world population projected to live in urban areas by 2050, says UN. Available at: https:// www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/2018-revision-of-world-urba nization-prospects.html (Accessed: 9 February 2022).
Voorhees, A. M. (1955). A general theory of traffic movement, proceedings (pp. 46–56). New Haven, CT: Institute of Traffic Engineers. (reprinted in Transportation, 40, pp. 1105–1116, 2013).
Wilson, A. G. (1971). A family of spatial interaction models, and associated developments. Environment and Planning A, 3, 1–32.
Yano, K., Nakaya, T., & Ishikawa, Y. (2000). An analysis of inter-municipal migration flows in Japan using GIS and spatial interaction modeling. Geographical Review of Japan, Series B, 73(2), 165–177.
Yuliara, I. M. (2016). Regresi linier berganda. Denpasar: Universitas Udayana
