WHAT KIND OF PHILOSOPHY UNDERLIES THE FUTURE CURRICULUM FOR INDONESIA?
Keywords:
Future curriculum, Philosophy, Idealism, Materialism, Ki Hajar DewantaraAbstract
Nowadays, there are many educational problems experienced by the education system in Indonesia. The educational problem that is most clearly seen as an evaluation of the learning process is the problem of learning outcomes for Indonesian students in Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) and Program for International Student Assessment (PISA). In terms of developing the personality or character of students, problems with disciplinary action, juvenile delinquency, honesty, and so on still adorn Indonesian education today. Educators must shape the character of students based on their local potential. The local potential can be in the form of local wisdom that forms a positive attitude of students in order to survive in the 21st-century competition. Seeing the problems that have been previously disclosed, the world of education in Indonesia actually needs to redefine the educational philosophy that underlies its curriculum to meet future curriculum needs. The results of qualitative descriptive research show 1) that the philosophical schools that underlie education are idealism, perennialism, reconstructionism, essentialism, progressivism, pragmatism, realism, materialism, and existentialism, 2) Philosophy for the current curriculum is related to the current curriculum. which is related to the independent learning curriculum and the independent campus is closely related to the philosophy of progressivism and materialism, 3) While the philosophical schools that underlie the future curriculum are the idealism, pragmatism, and humanist philosophy of Ki Hajar Dewantara
Downloads
References
Agustiani, ED (2020). Science Teachers and Prospective Science Teachers Facing PISA Character Questions. Journal of Teacher Studies and Learning, 3(1), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.30605/JSGP.3.1.2020.237
Ahmad, L., Setyawan, Sibyan Ernawati, DNT, & Deshinta, A. (2019). IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TEACHINGS OF KI HADJAR DEWANTARA (NITENI, NIROKKE, NAMBAHI) IN STUDENT WORKSHEETS. Indonesian Journal of Natural Science Education, 2(2), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.31002/NSE.V2I2.700
Anugerahwati, M. (2019). Integrating the 6Cs of the 21st Century Education into the English Lesson and the School Literacy Movement in Secondary Schools. KnE Social Sciences, 3(10), 165. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i10.3898
Arjaya, I. (2013). Environmental Based Self Directed Learning Model in Biology Learning. Biology Seminar Proceedings, 20. http://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/prosbio/article/viewFile/3064/2101
Bandura, A. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38(1), 9–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410606
Fadlillah, M. (2017). Progressivism in Education in Indonesia. Dimendi Education And Learning, 5(1), 17–24.
Farihah, I. (2015). KARL MARX'S MATERIALISM PHILOSOPHY. Journal of Aqidah and Religious Studies, 3(2).
Geng, S., Law, KMY, & Niu, B. (2019). Investigating self-directed learning and technology readiness in blending learning environments. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0147-0
Hadi, S., & Novaliyosi. (2019). TIMSS Indonesia (Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study). Proceedings of the National Seminar & Call For Papers, Masters Program in Mathematics Education, Siliwangi University, 562–569. http://jurnal.unsil.ac.id/index.php/sncp/article/view/1096
Hamidy, A., & Jailani, J. (2019). The mathematical process ability of East Kalimantan students in solving mathematics problems using the PISA model. Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 6(2), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.21831/JRPM.V6I2.26679
Hardanti, WB (2020). Ontological Basis, Oxiological, Epithesmolosis of the School of Philosophy of Essentialism and Its View on Education. Reforma: Journal of Education and Learning, 9(2), 87–95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30736/rf.v9i2.320
Hijriani, L., Rahardjo, S., & Rahardi, R. (2018). Deskripsi Representasi Matematis Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal PISA. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 3(5), 603–607. https://doi.org/10.17977/JPTPP.V3I5.11061
Irwansyah, M., Ferawati, F., Suryani, E., Olahairullah, O., Ariyansyah, A., Nurfathurrahmah, N., & Rubianti, I. (2020). Developing biology learning tools based on character education integrated with sustainable local wisdom to enhance 21st-century attitude of students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042017
Khoirunnisa, F., & Romadhoni, MZ (2020). Filsafat Pragmatisme. http://eprints.umsida.ac.id/7571/1/Makalah-Filsafat-A2-Pragmatisme.pdf
Mubin, A. (2019). Refleksi Pendidikan Filsafat Idealisme. Rausyan Fikr : Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pencerahan, 15(2), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.31000/rf.v15i2.1801
Mudana, IGAMG (2019). MEMBANGUN KARAKTER DALAM PERSPEKTIF FILSAFAT PENDIDIKAN KI HADJAR DEWANTARA. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 2(2), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.23887/JFI.V2I2.21285
Nastiti, FE, & 'Abdu, ARN (2020). Kesiapan Pendidikan Indonesia Menghadapi era society 5.0. Edcomtech : Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 5(1), 61–66.
Siregar, RL (2016). Teori Belajar Perenialisme. Al-Hikmah: Jurnal Agama Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan, 13(2), 172–183. https://doi.org/10.25299/al-hikmah:jaip.2016.vol13(2).1522
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (Issue 1,2). Alfabeta, CV.
Suhendar, S., & Wahyuni, A. (2018). Achievement and response of students at favorite junior high schools in sukabumi on trends in international mathematics and science study (timss) questions. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 11(2), 126–133. https://doi.org/10.21009/BIOSFERJPB.V11N2.126-133
Suparlan, H. (2015). FILSAFAT PENDIDIKAN KI HADJAR DEWANTARA DAN SUMBANGANNYA BAGI PENDIDIKAN INDONESIA. Jurnal Filsafat, 25(1).
Surbakti. (2021). Tersesat Idealisme, Terjebak Pragmatisme. https://www.kompasiana.com/jbsoke0694/60c86da9d541df18b74a0ac2/tersesat-idealisme-terjebak-pragmatisme?page=1&page_images=1
Thabrani, AM (2015). Filsafat dalam pendidikan (A. Rafik (ed.); 1st ed.). IAIN Jember Press. http://digilib.iain-jember.ac.id/424/1/9. Buku%3B Filsafat Dalam Pendidikan.pdf
Thaib, RM (2018). Pragmatisme: Konsep Utilitas Dalam Pendidikan. Intelektualita, 4(1), 96–110.
Tytler, R. (2007). Re-imagining Science Education Engaging students in science for Australia's future Australian Education Review. www.acer.edu.au
Yanuarti, E. (2017). Pemikiran Pendidikan Ki Hajar Dewantara dan Relevansinya dengan Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Penelitian, 11(2).
Yusuf, M., & Arfiansyah, W. (2021). Konsep “Merdeka Belajar” dalam Pandangan Filsafat Konstruktivisme. AL-MURABBI: Jurnal Studi Kependidikan Dan Keislaman, 7(2), 120–133. https://doi.org/10.53627/jam.v7i2.3996
