PRACTICALITY OF A HYBRID BOOK AS READING MEDIA IN AN INCLUSIVE CLASS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36733/jsp.v16i1.13359Keywords:
Deaf-Mute Students,, Hybrid Book,, Inclusive Classroom,, Practicality,, Reading,Abstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the practicality of a hybrid book created to support the educational resources of an inclusive English class at SDN 2 Bengkala. The study employed a Research and Development (R&D) design using the ADDIE model. The study considers research questions related to the practicality of the implemented media. Teachers and students were given practical questionnaires to complete to get the data. The results showed that learning media incorporating multimodal components, such as interactive content, sign language videos, and visual aids, are necessary for inclusive students, particularly those who are deaf and mute. 93% of teachers and 90% of students scored the practicality test as extremely practical, indicating very good practicality. As a result, it is possible to use the hybrid book as an approachable and helpful teaching tool in an inclusive English course. By providing a sustainable media innovation that can be further developed and applied to various disciplines and educational levels, this research advances inclusive education.
Downloads
References
Al-Azawei, A., Serenelli, F., & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Universal design for learning (UDL): A content analysis of peer reviewed journals from 2012 to 2015. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(3 SE-Articles), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v16i3.19295
Alqurashi, E. (2019). Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education, 40(1), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553562
Anggia, H., & Habók, A. (2023). Textual complexity adjustments to the English reading comprehension test for undergraduate EFL students. Heliyon, 9(1), e12891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12891
Blaabæk, E. H. (2020). Reading when the sun does not shine: The effect of reading on children’s academic performance. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 67, 100485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2020.100485
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. London: Springer.
CAST. (2011). Universal design for learning ( UDL ) guidelines version 2.0. Wakefield: MA: Author.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Dick, W., Carey, L. and Carey, J. (2009). The systematic design of instruction. (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Higher Education Inc.
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
Mahendra, F. F. N. (2020). Mobile assisted language learning: Increasing students’ reading interest through e-book. Acitya: Journal of Teaching & Education, 2(1), 2020. https://doi.org/10.30650/ajte.v2i1.272
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316941355
Muh. Yusuf, A., Jusriati, & Sari, P. (2023). The effectiveness of pop-up book in improving students’ reading interest. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 10(1), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.30605/25409190.571
Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to reach product quality. In J. van den Akker, R. M. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, & T. Plomp (Eds.), design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 125–135). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4255-7_10
Nurkencana, W., & Sunartana, P. P. (1992). Education evaluation. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.
Putu, I. G., Pramerta, A., Bagus, I., Arjaya, A., Ayu, P., & Devi, T. (2022). Learning media variation : Students’ perception. Jurnal Santiaji Pendidikan (JSP), 12(2), 180–184. https://doi.org/10.36733/jsp.v12i2.5267
Sariani, K. D. (2015). Unik, pendidikan formal SDN 2 bengkala ajarkan siswa bisu tuli. Tribun Bali News. Retrieved from https://bali.tribunnews.com/2015/03/17/unik-pendidikan-formal-sdn-2-bengkala-ajarkan-siswa-bisu-tuli
Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., & Liu, T.-C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252–275. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008
Surata, S. P. K., Diarta, I. M., Hermawan, I. M. S., & Mardikayasa, I. W. (2024). Visualisasi media gambar : Pemahaman mahasiswa pendidikan profesi guru tentang pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran biologi. Jurnal Santiaji Pendidikan (JSP), 14(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.36733/jsp.v14i1.8731
Tauchid, A., Saleh, M., Hartono, R., & Mujiyanto, J. (2022). English as an international language (EIL) views in Indonesia and Japan: A survey research. Heliyon, 8(10), e10785. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10785
Tessmer, M. (1993). Planning and conducting formative evaluations: improving the quality of education and training. London: Kogan Page. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=mEg9AAAAIAAJ
UNESCO. (2017). A Guide for ensuring inclusion and equity in education. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/MHHZ2237
UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: a new social contract for education. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/ASRB4722
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Putu Eva Julia Maharani, I G A Lokita Purnamika Utami
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
