AI and Data Systems for Credible University CSR: Technology-Driven Impact Measurement and Reporting in Philippine Private Higher Education Institutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36733/ijassd.v8i1.14094Keywords:
corporate social responsibility, private higher education, learning analytics, artificial intelligenceAbstract
In recent years, expectations of accountability in the Philippines have expanded beyond traditional measures of higher education performance such as enrollment, board examination results, and graduate employability. Private higher education institutions were assessed by how responsibly they cared for students, engaged communities, treated employees, and managed institutional resources. Although CSR initiatives were visible across the sector, this study examined how digital systems supported corporate social responsibility in private higher education institutions. A document-based multiple-case approach was used to analyze governance practices, measurement routines, and reporting patterns across institutions. Findings showed that technology strengthened CSR only when measurement and reporting were embedded in governance and decision-making, rather than treated as communication activities. Institutions using clear indicators, assigned responsibility for data, and conducted regular reviews demonstrated stronger alignment between stated commitments and actual practices. Student-centered responsibilities, scholarships, learning support, and welfare services, emerged as the most credible areas of technology-enabled CSR because they were directly experienced by stakeholders. The study found that opaque use of data weakened trust when issues of privacy and fairness were not addressed. Digital systems supported responsible practice only when grounded in accountability, transparency, and institutional care.
Downloads
References
Abello-Romero, J., Mancilla, C., Restrepo, K., Saez, W., Duran-Seguel, I., & Ganga-Contreras, F. (2024). Sustainability reporting in the university context: A review and analysis of the literature. Sustainability, 16(24), 10888. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162410888
Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., van Ginkel, S., Macfadyen, L. P., & Biemans, H. J. A. (2022). A systematic review of the role of learning analytics in enhancing feedback practices in higher education. Educational Research Review, 37, 100489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100489
Berg, F., Kolbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315-1344. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac033
Cerratto Pargman, T., & McGrath, C. (2021). Mapping the ethics of learning analytics in higher education: A systematic literature review of empirical research. Journal of Learning Analytics, 8(2), 123-139. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2021.7254
Choi, H.-Y., & Park, J. (2022). Do data-driven CSR initiatives improve CSR performance? The importance of big data analytics capability. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 182, 121802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121802
Commission on Higher Education. (2020). CHED Memorandum Order No. 4, s. 2020: Guidelines on the implementation of flexible learning. CHED.
Commission on Higher Education. (2021). CHED Memorandum Order No. 20, s. 2021: Guidelines on the implementation of flexible learning options and gradual reopening of campuses for limited face-to-face classes. CHED.
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. (2023). Achieving effective internal control over sustainability reporting (ICSR): Building trust and confidence through the COSO Internal Control-Integrated Framework. COSO.
Data Privacy Council Education Sector. (2020). Education Sector Advisory No. 2020-1: Data privacy and online learning. National Privacy Commission.
de Villiers, C., Dimes, R., & Molinari, M. (2024). How will AI text generation and processing impact sustainability reporting? Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 15(1), 96-118. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2022-0498
Farnell, T. (2022). How to measure community engagement in higher education? Towards a European framework for community engagement in higher education [Presentation]. European Higher Education Area. https://ehea.info/Upload/3%20TEFCE%20TFarnell_BFUG%20WG%20SD_17_02_2022.pdf
Global Reporting Initiative. (2021). GRI 1: Foundation 2021. GRI. https://globalreporting.org/standards/gri-standards/gri-1-foundation-2021/
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. (2024). International Standard on Sustainability Assurance 5000 (ISSA 5000): General requirements for sustainability assurance engagements. IAASB.
International Sustainability Standards Board. (2023a). IFRS S1: General requirements for disclosure of sustainability-related financial information. IFRS Foundation.
International Sustainability Standards Board. (2023b). IFRS S2: Climate-related disclosures. IFRS Foundation.
Leal Filho, W., Coronado-Marin, A., Salvia, A. L., Silva, A. L., Wolf, F., LeVasseur, T., Doni, F., Paco, A., & Blicharska, M. (2022). International trends and practices on sustainability reporting in higher education institutions. Sustainability, 14(19), 12238. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912238
Liu, Q., & Khalil, M. (2023). Understanding privacy and data protection issues in learning analytics using a systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(4), 1516-1536. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13388
National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2023). Artificial intelligence risk management framework (AI RMF 1.0) (NIST AI 100-1). U.S. Department of Commerce. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1
Philippine Accrediting Association of Schools, Colleges and Universities. (2020). PAASCU Quality Standards (Approved by the Board of Trustees, August 28, 2020). PAASCU. https://paascu.org.ph/paascu-quality-standards/
Philippine Accrediting Association of Schools, Colleges and Universities. (2021). 2021 accreditation guidebook. PAASCU.
Slade, S., Prinsloo, P., & Khalil, M. (2023). "Trust us", they said: Mapping the contours of trustworthiness in learning analytics. Information and Learning Sciences, 124(9/10), 306-325. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-06-2022-0067
UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2023a). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education - A tool on whose terms? UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2023b). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO.
World Bank. (2022). Digital transformation of Philippine higher education. World Bank.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hazel S. Osano, Anik Yuesti, Joel Arante Alve, Dennis Villasor Madrigal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


